The city rules that an Arizona United Methodist church canâ€™t feed the poor on their property as the city rules that giving away a free pancake breakfast one day a week constitutes a city feeding program. First of all I canâ€™t believe that giving away a free breakfast once a week constitutes a feeding program. Secondly I canâ€™t grasp that they need to bus homeless people into the area to feed them pancakes. Itâ€™s not that that hard to do this in a remote location, with probably less cost, more impact, and less controversy so it isnâ€™t a clear cut case. I would care more if the homeless were from that neighborhood being denied by the city (which happens lots) rather than being bussed in but that is just me.