Before the iPhone, RIM’s BlackBerry was the king of smartphones. They seemed unstoppable, because by most accounts, they were the best and most successful at what most smartphones were for at the time: email and phone calls.
When the iPhone came out, the BlackBerry continued to do well for a little while. But the iPhone had completely changed the game — it changed what smartphones were for, from basic business-focused email devices to entire consumer personal computers with desktop-class operating systems and rich app ecosystems.
The BlackBerry’s success came to an end not because RIM started releasing worse smartphones, but because the new job of the smartphone shifted almost entirely outside of their capabilities, and it was too late to catch up. RIM hadn’t spent years building a world-class operating system, or a staff full of great designers, or expertise in mass production of luxury-quality consumer electronics, or amazing APIs and developer tools, or an app store with millions of users with credit cards already on file, or all of the other major assets that Apple had developed over a decade (or longer) that enabled the iPhone.
No new initiative, management change, or acquisition in 2007 could’ve saved the BlackBerry. It was too late, and the gulf was too wide.
Today, Amazon, Facebook, and Google are placing large bets on advanced AI, ubiquitous assistants, and voice interfaces, hoping that these will become the next thing that our devices are for.
If they’re right — and that’s a big “if” — I’m worried for Apple.
There is no doubt Chicago is facing a gun crisis. In the first three months of this year murders are up more than 80 per cent compared with the same period in 2015. A total of 135 people have been shot dead, more than in New York and Los Angeles combined.
At least 727 people have suffered gunshot wounds in the most violent start to a year in two decades. Guns are changing hands for less than US$50. Most of the shootings take place in parts of the city’s South and West Sides, where gangs have splintered into small factions fighting over a few blocks.
Increasingly, death is preceded by social media taunts in what has become known as “cyberbanging.”
Professor Arthur Lurigio, a criminal justice expert at Loyola University Chicago said: “You have to be hyper-masculine, so if you get insulted on Facebook the only face-saving thing is to go shoot someone. The problem is they can’t shoot, they’ve never been to a practice range, so innocent children are getting hit.”
One of those innocent children was Zarriel Trotter, 13, who had recently appeared in an award-winning Internet campaign against guns. In the film Zarriel says: “I don’t want to live around my community where I’ve got to keep on hearing people getting shot.”
Last week Zarriel was himself shot in the back as he walked home from basketball practice and was left in a critical condition in hospital. According to witnesses, he was passing by as two groups of young boys opened fire following an argument over a girl.
Other incidents also stand out. One was the assassination of Tyshawn Lee, nine. He was murdered in an alleyway, allegedly by gang rivals of his father.
Actually the problem is that they are shooting each other after being insulted on Facebook.
MSN Messenger was a hard-working internet visionary which taught a generation to touch-type and lol, writes BBC technology reporter Dave Lee.
It touched the lives of millions of teenagers who, in an age before real social networking, were just getting accustomed to what it was like to live on the internet.
MSN Messenger heralded a new era: a time when chatting up a classmate no longer meant the terrifying prospect of actually having to say something to them.
It meant no longer would young teens have to endure the torture of ringing the landline number of their newest crush – knowing there was a high probability that dad would pick up.
But after all the “ASL?”s and “u there?”s, Messenger’s loyal subjects became less dependent. “I’ll brb”, people said… but they never did.
Other sites, smarter and better looking, would see Messenger cast aside. In an age of exciting digital discovery, Messenger became the web’s wooden toy.
After a long career, it spent its final year enjoying a comfortable retirement in China. Its less well-regarded relative, Windows Messenger, still battles on on work computers the world over.
“It’s like MSN,” office workers say, “â€¦just not as fun.”
MSN Messenger is survived by Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Snapchat, Skype, Google+ and Instagram.
Â There are more than 300 of them in New York â€” violent crews of dozens of 12- to 20-year-olds with names such as Very Crispy Gangsters, True Money Gang and Cash Bama Bullies.
Police say these groups, clustered around a particular block or housing project, are responsible for about 40 percent of the cityâ€™s shootings, with most of that violence stemming from the smallest of disses on the street, Facebook, Twitter or Instagram.
â€œItâ€™s like belonging to an evil fraternity,â€ said Inspector Kevin Catalina, commander of the New York Police Departmentâ€™s gang division. â€œA lot of it is driven by nothing: A dispute over a girl or a wrong look or a perceived slight.â€
The trend of smaller, younger crews has also been seen in Chicago and Northeast cities over the last few years as police have cracked down on bigger, more traditional gangs, experts said. While the Bloods, Crips and Latin Kings still exist, operating such money-making schemes as drug dealing, their members are usually older and understand the timeworn mantra of organized crime: violence is bad for business.
Not so for the crews, whose recklessness prompted former Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly in 2012 to launch an initiative to confront the crews dubbed Operation Crew Cut.
Investigators now focus on gathering intelligence about specific crews â€” understanding their activities, allegiances and feuds, which they glean through traditional street policing and trolling of social media sites, cellphone photos and even recorded jailhouse calls.
Police have also stepped up arrests of the most active crew members. In Manhattan, prosecutors set up an internal email alert system that notifies them when crew member are arrested, even on minor charges, and provides beyond-the-rap-sheet details for bail arguments. The prosecutor might mention that the person was a suspect in another crime or had made threats on Facebook, for instance.
In a recent case in Harlem, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. says a 2009 killing kindled years of vendetta attacks, including three killings and 30 shootings. Sixty-three people were rounded up, and at least 62 entered guilty pleas, including crew members so young that one told another to â€œmob upâ€ after school.
â€œThe evidence was very powerful,â€ said Robert Anesi, who represented a 19-year-old who pleaded guilty to attempted murder and conspiracy charges in the case last week. â€œThey had such access to social media and they knew who the players were.â€
NYPD statistics show gang arrests are up citywide nearly 14 percent from 2013 â€” and more than 28 percent from two years ago. Shooting incidents citywide are about the same as they were last year, with 282 recorded so far, and are down by nearly 23 percent from two years ago.
Still, crew-related violence persists despite record dips in overall crime in New York City over the last few years. The most notable recent case came in March when investigators say a 14-year-old member of the Stack Money Goons shot a .357 revolver at a rival member of the Twan Family on a crowded bus in Brooklyn. The bullet instead killed an immigrant father who was working two jobs to support his family.
â€œWhen you ask young adults, â€˜Why? Why did you shoot that young man?â€™ Probably 80 percent of the time the answer is: He disrespected me,â€ said Kai Smith, an ex-con-turned-businessman who runs a gang-diversion program in city high schools.
Paul Niehaus, an assistant professor of economics at UC San Diego and a board member of GiveDirect, came up with the idea of transferring money to poor peopleâ€™s cell phones back in 2008. He was working with the Indian government to limit corruption and saw how the government there transferred money to peopleâ€™s phones. â€œI realized I could do that myself,â€ Niehaus told me. He told the gathering in San Francisco that most of the money thatâ€™s donated to help poor people goes to international development organizations, not poor people directly. GiveDirectlyâ€™s giving has had â€œbig impacts on nutrition, education, land and livestockâ€ and â€œhasnâ€™t been shown to increase how much people drink,â€ Niehaus emphasized. â€œA typical poor person is poor not because he is irresponsible, but because he was born in Africa.â€
GiveDirectly finds poor households â€“ typically people who live in mud huts with thatched roofs â€“ and uses a system called M-Pesa, run by Vodafone , to transfer money to their cell phones. Transaction fees eat up a mere 3 cents per donated dollar. Niehaus says plenty of recipients use the money to upgrade their homes by adding a metal roof.
Which is why I like to give money through Kiva.
Slate’sÂ Matthew Yglesias says much the same thing in Slate
Poverty is, fundamentally, a lack of money. So doesnâ€™t it make sense that simply delivering cash to poor people can be an effective strategy for alleviating it?
Transferring money to poor Americans has been a much bigger success than most of us realize. When it comes to the global poorâ€”the hundreds of millions of slum-dwellers and subsistence farmers who still populate the worldâ€”one might be more skeptical. Perhaps the problems facing these unfortunates are simply too profound and too complex to be addressed by anything other than complicated development schemes. Well, perhaps.
But thereâ€™s striking new evidence that helping the truly poor really is as simple as handing them money. Money with no strings attached not only directly raises the living standards of those who receive it, but it also increases hours worked and labor productivity, seemingly laying the groundwork for growth to come.
Anil Dash has a great essay on the web that we have a decade ago versus the one we have today.
When you see interesting data mash-ups today, they are often still using Flickr photos because Instagram’s meager metadata sucks, and the app is only reluctantly on the web at all. We get excuses about why we can’t search for old tweets or our own relevant Facebook content, though we got more comprehensive results from a Technorati search that was cobbled together on the feeble software platforms of its era. We get bullshit turf battles like Tumblr not being able to find your Twitter friends or Facebook not letting Instagram photos show up on Twitter because of giant companies pursuing their agendas instead of collaborating in a way that would serve users. And we get a generation of entrepreneurs encouraged to make more narrow-minded, web-hostile products like these because it continues to make a small number of wealthy people even more wealthy, instead of letting lots of people build innovative new opportunities for themselves on top of the web itself.
While the mobile web has been great, I miss the open web which seems to get a little smaller each day.
The interruptions that come in from Twitter, Facebook, and text messages at work pretty much makes having a meeting or even a conversation impossible some days. Â I think we lose half of our working days some day to social media which is really appalling. Â With texting making it easy for anyone to get you at anytime, it is almost as if work plays second fiddle to personal correspondence in many places. Â It’s no wonder why some organizations pay for voice but don’t give out data plans on their company phones; employees don’t know how to police them.
There are a variety of good discussions online. Â As the group intro says.
Hello and welcome. This community page represents the neighbourhoods of Hudson Bay Park, Mayfair and Kelsey/Woodlawn in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. Our group is for everyone who lives in our neighbourhoods, as well as those who might want to join for information on a variety of community topics. Discussions might be about upcoming events in our neighbourhoods, concerns in the community, or other community-related topics.
Have some plants to give away? Need daycare? Great new shop recently opened up nearby? Concerned about something going on? Want to volunteer for your Community Association and help make our neighbourhoods a better place for everyone?
We like to keep discussions as civil as possible, while still allowing for differences of opinion to be discussed. We’re not always going to like what others have to say, but if we can remain respectful while expressing ourselves, we can all have our say and likely learn a thing or two from one another.
Take care of yourselves, your neighbours, and your neighbourhood.
Back then all this was much smaller. There were far fewer bloggers. Maybe thousands. Today there are millions. None of them are thinking about what happens when Tumblr or Blogger or WordPress or Facebook disappear. But come on â€” we almost know for certain that one of them will. Given enough time they will all disappear. Doesn’t it make sense to think, in advance about what will happen then? Technically there are good practices that exist right now, that could ameliorate the problems. Don’t we have a responsibility to implement them?
Which gets me to the beginning. Yesterday I wrote a piece where I said that the web is socialist. I strongly believe if you try to turn a community of bloggers into a property, someday you’ll wake up to the realization that you bought a bag of air. There’s nothing inside the walls that’s worth anything, from a dollar standpoint. What happens then dear blogger? Do you think anyone is going to subsidize the hosting? You will be on your own that day. And you very likely won’t have any recourse, any more than my users had in 2003. I promise you I was well-intentioned, but that didn’t save the sites. Good intentions are no answer. Saying they’re not your users won’t help either. In 2003 they weren’t mine because I was no longer employed by the company. No salary. No upside. Nothing. I quit for a very good reason. So why me? It was basically an accident that the hits were coming to my server. That didn’t matter to the users. Were they right? Hard to say. But it didn’t matter.
So-called â€œclick-through ratesâ€ â€“ the proportion of times a user clicks on an ad to get their browser to go to another site â€“ are notoriously low on Facebook: roughly 0.035 per cent in the U.S., according to research provided by the digital marketing agency Resolution Media. (By some estimates, Googleâ€™s click-through rate on ads is about 10 times greater.)
â€œFinding ROI [return-on-investment] on Facebook is a bit tricky,â€ agreed Mr. Bandurski.
Until now, Facebook has served up advertising only to people who â€œLikeâ€ a particular brand, or to friends of those users. But this week it began experimenting with ads that pop up in usersâ€™ Facebook feeds â€“ even if they havenâ€™t agreed to accept messages from that advertiser.
The practice is likely to upset not just the networkâ€™s users, but some of the companies that have invested heavily in getting people to â€œLikeâ€ them so they can send out their marketing messages.
It makes sense. When I am on Google I am looking for something. When you are using Facebook, you are looking for friends which is why I have always wondered why brands advertised there.
While in Edmonton we got lost. I found out that no one in the car can read a GPS and I was driving with them navigating. Not only that but NO ONE at Hope Mission would give Katie or DeeAnn an address. Great discipline but a big time pain in the neck as we were trying to figure out where to go. While we were driving, DeeAnn was trying to persuade me to spam my friends with the Lighthouse Facebook page so they will â€œlikeâ€ it. Somehow she started to explain Facebook to me and never really clicked in that not only was I probably in really early, I was in so early, I left before it got cool. Twitter is much more my style. As I have said, what the strangers I know on Twitter are doing are more interesting to me than what my friends are doing on Facebook.
So for about 30 minutes, she was evangelizing Facebook to me while I just ignored her but she did make some good points about if we are trying to make social change, we should use the mediums we have at our disposal and Facebook is one of the things we have at our disposal.
As much as I hate Facebook, I need to be using it more effectively than logging in once a year (generally in January). From now on I plan to log in a couple of times a week if for no other reason than to reply to some of the messages and post some things to The Lighthouseâ€™s page. According to experts, an organization needs to spend about six hours a week to social media for it to be effective. I donâ€™t have six hours a week but DeeAnn seems to (she is The Lighthouseâ€™s director of communications and it is part of her job). That being said, I realized that more and more people are going to our Facebook page expecting to find that I show up more than once a year.
As for Google Circles (cue tumbleweed), it is so quiet that I am not sure if it is worth my time and effort. If I had to choose between the two, I think I would choose Facebook. I am not sure I would use it if it wasnâ€™t for the good work DeeAnn has done with it at The Lighthouse but she has so I need to be a part of that as well. I care a lot about social change and that means taking the message to where the people are. As for Google Circles, it doesnâ€™t even seem to have a functioning API which is shocking considering it is coming from Google. Twitter canâ€™t post to it, Feedburner canâ€™t post to it (and it is owned by Google). Maybe that is intentional but I doubt it. There just isnâ€™t very much content that you can put on there without going to the site. If things change, maybe Iâ€™ll head back but for now, it doesnâ€™t capture my attention.
Walking home from the fourth annual f8 conference earlier this week I kept wondering why I hadnâ€™t gone over to the massive Sean Parker/Spotify after party. Over the past few years, Facebookâ€™s f8 after party was an opportunity to schmooze with people of all levels within the company. This year however, the â€œA-Listâ€ and â€œB-Listâ€ along with the press were shuttled over to listen to Snoop Dogg, Janeâ€™s Addiction, and others.
While I actually could have headed over thanks to my f8 press pass, I decided just to head home. There was something about this exclusivity that was genuinely frustrating me. Walking around the f8 after party, I had the opportunity to chat with Facebook employees, but none of the â€œimportantâ€ ones appeared to be there. Whatâ€™s just now starting to sink in is how tasteless the over the top party actually was. While Sean Parker spent tons of money earned from his Facebook shares on a Spotify party with top tier talent, the majority of Facebook employees got to listen to a second-rate artist screeching through the speakers in the main concourse center.
The ironic part is that the hard work of the individuals in the official f8 party are what helped make Facebook the company it is today. I can guarantee you that any of the people at the official event werenâ€™t feeling too positive about the experience. People who literally created some of the content that Mark Zuckerberg showcased on stage werenâ€™t invited. They also sounded pretty ticked off.
This sort of exclusive mentality is exactly the opposite of what has built Silicon Valley. I remember going to one of the early unofficial Facebook developer conferences and Mitch Kapor, the founder of Lotus, came to chat with developers who were building some of the first apps. Talk about being a humble billionaire. Having access to these people is exactly why I found Silicon Valley to be so incredible. Yet over the past couple years things have changed. At Techcrunch Disrupt Erick Schonfeld asked me naively, â€œYou would actually meet with other strangers?â€, referring to the Holler application. Correct me if Iâ€™m wrong but wasnâ€™t that the purpose of the very conference he was hosting?
As an employee who has felt both included and excluded from major organizational events, you have no idea how much more valued being included made me feel and how being excluded made me feel devalued.
This afternoon Wendy, Mark, and Oliver are at the 2011 Caswell Arts Festival. Itâ€™s a great event and a lot of fun. One problem, we almost missed out on it because we never heard of it until the last minute. I am not blaming the organizers or anyone else. They have always done a good job getting the word out but for some reason we were not in the places where the word was.
It brought back memories of some of the political campaigns from the spring where everyone was using Facebook to publicize their events and campaign. Itâ€™s great if you are are on Facebook and happen to be â€œfriendsâ€ with the candidate, not so great if you are not logged in and donâ€™t use the book with a face (like myself). So how do you publicize your events to the entire city?
- Itâ€™s free to signup (most of us have a Yahoo! username already)
- You donâ€™t need to be signed in to view events and get information.
- Itâ€™s free to post events and add venues. Every couple of weeks I find some time to look around and post some things of interest to the site. Even if I donâ€™t plan on or can attend, it lets others know about the event. Both Google and
Yahoo! SearchBing spider the site which means that you are making it easier for anyone to find the event.
- It links up with Flickr so any photos that you posted to an event can be linked back to it.
- Itâ€™s neutral and user generated. You donâ€™t have to worry about someone not liking your event and taking it down.
- There is a place to add a link for the event and for tickets which means that the event organizer gets some Google love and people can go to the appropriate site for tickets.
- A lot of people are using it already and you donâ€™t have to be the organizer of the event to post it there. I tracked down a lot of events that Wendy and I are thinking of attending, found some graphics and created the listing from their website. If the event organizer wants to change it later, they can do that as well.
- It shows what events you are attending as well as the events your friends are going to.
- It offers the ability to create a group of friends, colleagues, or special interests that you can organize around.
- It will feed other sites that publicize information like radio stations, television stations, the paper, community newspapers, school newslettersâ€¦ you get the idea.
- Itâ€™s open instead of closed like Facebook.
As for the kind of events. Everyone of Saskatoonâ€™s festivals should be listed. Hilltops, Huskies, Saskatoon Blades, and Saskatoon Yellow Jackets games. Public events at the University of Saskatchewan and SIAST. Political AGMs, rallies and nomination meetings, events at the Mendel and the WDM, and even City of Saskatoon information and public meetings, church special events (just donâ€™t post your regular service times), press conferences, and neighbourhood barbecues. You name it. If you want the city to know about it, post it online.
The end result would be a big online public square where we could come and discover what is happening in Saskatoon but also what our friends are doing. It would add a lot to city life in Saskatoon and be a great experiment in crowd sourcing everything that is great in our city.
I am not even that stuck on Upcoming, there is also Eventful but I am not fond of the ads everywhere and I prefer the Yahoo!/Upcoming interface. So if you are interested and agree, sign up, post an event (or let people know you are attending an event), and let your friends know. Then link to the Upcoming page for the event when you are talking about it. If you want to, add me as a friend.