Military procurements usually begin with the drawing up of a â€œstatement of operational requirements,â€ which manufacturers then use to prepare bids. But more often than not, the generals and admirals have already made their decision and â€œfix the specsâ€ to secure the equipment they want.
Defence officials decided the CF-18 replacements needed stealth technology, thus excluding all aircraft other than the F-35. They narrowed the field for the fixed-wing search and rescue project by specifying a minimum cabin length just 15 centimetres greater â€” and a cruising speed just 12 knots faster â€” than the Spanish-made EADS C-295. They set a minimum size for Canadaâ€™s maritime helicopter replacement that excluded the Sikorsky Seahawk, the workhorse of the U.S. navyâ€™s rotary wing fleet.
Officials like to buy so-called â€œpaper planesâ€ that are only in the design phase, since this offers the possibility of having the very latest and flashiest kit. But there are risks involved with unbuilt, unproven designs. The F-35 design proved grossly optimistic, leading to long delays, much-increased costs, and less than expected performance. The U.S. Department of Defense has already downgraded its specifications for the plane.
In the case of the planned Sikorsky Cyclone helicopters chosen to replace the Sea Kings, the generals and admirals added new electronics and weapons systems onto the design after the procurement was approved and a contract signed. All the additional equipment proved too heavy for the engines, which meant that more powerful engines had to be designed and fitted, which in turn required a lengthy and expensive full re-engineering of the aircraft.
Defence officials secure approval for these â€œpaper planesâ€ by telling ministers that Canadian companies involved in the initial production of cutting-edge military equipment will reap significant rewards when other countries purchase the same equipment later. The problem is that new designs fail more often than they succeed, and other countries shy away from equipment that underperforms or is overly delayed. No country apart from Canada has selected the Cyclone. Sales of the F-35 are far below the projected level, diminishing any economic benefits and driving up the per-unit cost.
Officials also lowball costs, or fail to inform ministers about maintenance, infrastructure and other â€œlife-cycleâ€ expenses related to the purchase. For the F-35s, defence officials said the cost would be $9.7 billion. The parliamentary budget officer said $29.3 billion. The auditor general said $25.1 billion. When the government brought in the accounting firm KPMG to provide some clarity, it said $45.8 billion.
If the numbers were not so very large, the audacity of the officials might be funny.
I was going through some old draft posts that I had never finished and I found one about Canadaâ€™s purchase of the F-35 and my thoughts on it. The time has past, the debate seems over and Canada seemed to have few other options but I was surfing Wikipedia and saw that Boeing is coming out with a stealthy version of itâ€™s F-15. I was interested in it because the F-35 Lightening II is not a very good air to air fighter and itâ€™s slow.
It was never conceptualized to be an air superiority fighter but rather a strike fighter. It only carries to air to air missiles and has a top speed of only Mach 1.6. Speed doesnâ€™t always matter but in an air battle when you are only carrying two missiles and have shot them both, it does. Not only that but during the first Gulf War, even F-15â€™s had a hard time dealing with the obsolete but still really fast Mig 25â€™s. At Mach 1.6, the F-35 will be almost 450 mph slower than expected fifth generation Russian and Chinese fighters. There has also been a series of reports out that specify that the new Russian fighters (Su-Pak FA) vastly out turn and out perform the F-35. With Canada only purchasing 60 F-35 to replace the 100 or so operational F-18s, perhaps a plane that can actually dogfight might be a good option. Since the F-22 isnâ€™t being exported to anyone, even staunch U.S. allies, expect the F-15 Silent Eagle to get a look by several U.S. allies who wanted the F-22 and donâ€™t want to settle for the F-35. Either way, it doesnâ€™t look like Canada will be able to operate with American permission and air cover for the foreseeable future. If that is the case, the F-35 will do us fine.
You can read more about the problems and controversy over the F-35 from a military standpoint here. Itâ€™s discomforting reading because no one really knows what kind if aircraft they are getting.