Declining sales on phones lead Samsung to smart appliances
The controlling Lee family is trying to reinvent Samsung as a purveyor of Internet-connected appliances to grab share of a market that may be worth $7.1-trillion (U.S.) by 2020. Samsung wants to generate revenue from Tizen applications and services just as Apple Inc. and Google do from their operating systems, and the Suwon, South Korea-based company is emphasizing TVs and consumer electronics after falling a year behind schedule on a Tizen-based phone.
â€œIn smartphones, thereâ€™s no chance that Samsungâ€™s Tizen can edge out the two dominant operating systems,â€ said Claire Kim, a Seoul-based analyst at Daishin Securities Co. â€œBut in TVs, Samsung may have a chance.â€
Samsungâ€™s rise to No. 1 in global phone sales depended on Googleâ€™s Android. Nearly all of the 243 million smartphones Samsung shipped through Sept. 30 ran the software, which Google typically gives away in return for mobile advertising revenue and a share of app sales.
Samsung faces the strongest challenge to its phone supremacy after posting the smallest quarterly earnings in more than two years. Operating profit at the mobile-phone unit, the companyâ€™s biggest cash generator, slumped 74 per cent in the September quarter and sales fell about 33 per cent.
I own an Apple TV and I just canâ€™t get excited about paying extra for a smart TV when I can plug one of those or a Google Chomecast (or Amazon Kindle, Rokuâ€¦.) for under $100 (or under $40 for the Google Chromecast) into the TV and have a smart TV.
The smart appliance market may become huge but I canâ€™t see the smart TV one being that big of deal at all, not when I can get my apps on my tablet and stream to my television.
Great public awareness campaign and website from the Government of Alberta on the dangers of texting and driving. Â I am amazed that despite the Saskatoon Police Service cracking down on it and the large fines that come along with it, many people I know text and use their phone while driving. Â It’s not that hard to put your phone on vibrate, put it face down and ignore it when in the car.
I was reading a couple of reviews for the LG Bliss and while I was okay with my Samsung Link, I would really liked a better web browser and some more app options. Wendy went out and bought me one and I have had it for the last week. Here are the pros of the phone.
- Decent web browser. Not as good as the iPhoneâ€™s but decent. I can use Gmailâ€™s text based or regular mobile interface as well as Google Calendar. It is exponentially faster than the Samsung Linkâ€™s browser and hey, it actually renders websites properly.
- The touch keyboard isnâ€™t that bad. After a week of using it, I have become fonder of it and faster using it than I was at the start of the week. It is just something to get used to but is quite usable.
- 2 megapixel camera. While I wonâ€™t be printing off a bunch of photos taken with it, it is good enough to upload to Flickr.
- Virgin Mobile only charges $10/month for unlimited web surfing. Thatâ€™s a great, great deal. With the speed of the browser, itâ€™s a service that I will be using a lot more rather than reaching for my iPod Touch.
- The speaker phone is quite a bit louder than my Samsung Link. I can toss it on the passenger seat and actually drive while having a conversation which is useful when I forget to grab my Bluetooth earpiece.
- While it has a decent text messaging inbox, it doesnâ€™t handle e-mail which I was sad about. The inbox is so well designed that pop3 or IMAP capability would be amazing.
- While Google java apps install, they wonâ€™t work because of the touch screen. Quite annoying and the phone would go from good to amazing if it worked with Google apps.
- I miss the â€œrecently textedâ€ list that the Samsung Link has. Itâ€™s a great way to keep those that I am in constant contact with in easy reach.
Overall, itâ€™s not a smartphone and if I was RIM, I wouldnâ€™t be that worried that it was going to eat away Blackberry marketshare but itâ€™s cheap ($119 with no contract), works well as a cell phone, and pretty good as a digital media and web browsing device. If you are a Bell, Virgin Mobile, or SaskTel customer, you may want to check it out. As for the Samsung Link, itâ€™s a great texting phone, has the Virgin Email App installed, is a great price ($69.99) but doesnâ€™t get along that well with the web. In the end, it kind of comes down to which you care about more, the web or email but both are good phones. Wendy has a Samsung Link and I am happy with the LG Blissâ€¦ we donâ€™t have any regrets with either purchase.
I generally upgrade my cell phones about every five years or so. To say I am a late adapter in this area would be an understatement. Not only that but Wendyâ€™s cell phone is almost 8 years old so she was due for a new one as well.
After looking around for months, I decided to get a Samsung r610 and make the move to Virgin Mobile. Believe it or not, it is also my first phone with a camera in it.
Everyone seemed shocked that I didnâ€™t get a iPhone or a Blackberry but I have my iPhone touch which handles my e-mail, schedule, and has a enough games on it to keep Mark happy when he has to wait on me so I donâ€™t really need a smart phone.
What I liked about Virgin was their rates and the fact that it used the SaskTel network in province. While Fido and Rogers work okay in the cities, I need to leave the major highways once in a while and with Virgin I donâ€™t have to sacrifice any coverage. Now I just need to figure out how to send a photo via e-mail that I take. So far, no success. I hate to think that I need to crack a manual.
I have posted about this before but some idiot spammer is using a fake @jordoncooper.com address as a return address to spam cell phones with. Since this costs some people money, they are upset but as I have said, I donâ€™t have anything to do with it. This is a personal site that doesnâ€™t sell anything. Whoever it is, they are using a fake address and header so they donâ€™t get tracked down and so they donâ€™t have to deal with all of the angry e-mail about it or incur the wrath of those who are being charged by the message.
On the suggestion of some of you, I have talked to my ISP about it and asked them to make sure there isnâ€™t a security hole in WordPress or in my site that someone is exploiting. They looked into it and it isnâ€™t coming from my domain. Their reply was
â€¦the spammer is just using your domain as the return address so they don’t have to deal with the bounce messages and to try to throw people off the scent (so to speak).
In addition to this I have set up a Sender Policy Framework which makes verifies which mail has been sent from my site and which is sent from a forged address and gives that information to spam sites. Sadly that information isnâ€™t used by most cell phone carriers.
There is a solution! When looking into the problem, I found this blog post from David Pogue of the New York Times on how to block cell phone spam. It blocks messages from the web while allowing SMS messages to go on through. You can also block domain names (like jordoncooper.com which is fine since I donâ€™t send e-mail from it anyways). This way it blocks the moron who is using my domain name in vain AND allows you to keep getting your SMS messages.
Finally, this is a non-commercial hobby site with no revenue stream. It would make sense to go after the site that is selling whatever products the spam is promoting. They are the ones that would benefit from the spam and are probably the ones paying the jerk who is spamming you and making my life difficult.
I wish I could offer up more help but I havenâ€™t even seen the messages that are being sent out. Let me know in the comments if you have any questions.