I get asked all of the time what I read and I thought I would toss it into a blog post.
For news, the first site of the day I check on National Newswatch. Â If you aren’t checking it out everyday, you are doing your news all wrong. Â I then check out the links of The Morning News and browse Metafilter. Â I have had an account for years but rarely log in. Â I check out the National Post, Macleans, and The Globe and Mail. Â Once I get the national news I check out The Toronto StarÂ and Calgary Herald. Â While not daily reads, I do read everything that is posted to the Hill Times.
The two sites that I explore the most are Yahoo! Sports and ProFootballTalk. Â I check Yahoo! Sports about 10 times a day and ProFootballTalk in the morning and then again in the evening. Â It is America’s Cup season which means that I spend a lot of time on YouTube. Â I generally watch the 20 minute race recap and if I have time, I watch the whole race on my TV via the PS3 app. Â YouTube on your television will forever change the way you watch TV. Â It is amazing.
I also follow Doug Smith’s Sports Blog where he lives and mostly dies with the Raptors. Â I read it because he is a great source of Raptors news but also because he has a unique blogging style that I really like. Â Once I am there, I generally find myself in The Star’s sports section where the goal is to avoid the Toronto Maple Leafs coverage. Â Then it is to check out the National Post sports but more or less I am just there to see if I missed anything that Bruce Arthur wrote and I missed his tweet to it.
Sportsnet.ca is my next sports stop and that is see what Michael Grange is writing about. Â Much of Sportsnet is written by television personalities and it shows but Grange is a sportswriter.
I don’t blog a lot about military technology and affairs but I do read Wired’s Danger Room daily and Tom Rick’s The Best Defence Blog. Â For urban discussions I follow a lot of people on Twitter but I also check out the Direct Transfer, Streets Blog, and The Atlantic Cities.
For blogs like most of the free world, I read Kottke.org daily and check out Gordon Price‘s blog weekly. Â I would read City Hall Notebook more but The StarPhoenix kind of let it die, although it seems to be coming back to life lately.
There are always a couple of books on the go. Â I own a Kindle but don’t use it much. Â Mostly because I prefer to browse Indigo and McNally Robinson. Â For all of the wonderful things that Amazon.com does, browsing books is the domain of the bookstore.
What am I missing? Â Suggestions?
On Sept. 28, 2010, Ontario Superior Court Justice Susan Himel struck down three sections of Canadaâ€™s prostitution laws because they exposed sex-trade workers to unreasonable risk.
Himel ruled that communicating for the purposes of prostitution, living on the avails of prostitution and keeping a common bawdy house force sex-trade workers from the safety of their homes and onto the streets, where they are more vulnerable to violence.
The Criminal Code provisions, wrote Himel in her 131-page ruling, â€œforce prostitutes to choose between their liberty interest and their security of the person as protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.â€
Himelâ€™s ruling was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court is the end of the line in terms of ensuring that these Criminal Code provisions are not discarded â€” thus legalizing brothels, pimping and potentially even the bold kind of soliciting made so infamous in Amsterdamâ€™s red-light district.
Natasha Falle, who calls herself a sex-trade survivor, says â€œwomen like me donâ€™t think the way to protect women is behind legislated doors.â€
Speaking at Servants Anonymousâ€™ Cry of the Streets â€” Evening of Freedom fundraising event May 30 in Calgary, Falle says more women will be enslaved by human traffickers if those laws are deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
Looking much younger than her 40 years, Falle is the founder of Sextrade 101 â€” a public awareness organization and an instructor of police foundations at Humber College in Toronto.
She intends to show up at the Supreme Court next week holding a â€œpimp stickâ€ â€” an unravelled coat hanger that her pimp would often heat up on the stove and then use to whip her. Other former sex trade survivors will show up with other torture tools commonly used by pimps, such as curling irons and belts.
The daughter of a former Calgary police officer who, ironically, worked in the vice department, and a mother who worked in a bridal salon, Falle says she turned her first trick in Calgaryâ€™s Chinatown when she was 14 with a man with rotten teeth.
Her parents had split up and her family life fell apart. Falle started sleeping on friendsâ€™ couches until she wound up on the sofa of four young prostitutes whose pimp was out of town. Pretty soon, Falle followed their lead. At least they had a place to live and food to eat.
â€œI was trafficked across the country by the man who recruited me and who made false white-picket-fence intimacy promises,â€ Falle told the crowd.
â€œI made a lot of money. I bought my pimp a Mercedes. I had a Mustang, we lived in a penthouse, but I was still subjected to all of the violence,â€ she said. â€œHe broke my arms, my ribs; my nose has been broken three times.â€
Her point? This happened indoors. Not on the streets. The former prostitute says the worst beating she ever got was in a common bawdy house she shared with four other teens, so the idea that thereâ€™s safety in numbers is a myth.
Falle asks Canadians to consider what will happen to young women and girls should those prostitution laws be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
Prostitution will become a licensed business, pimps will be legitimate business people, billboards advertising brothels could start appearing on roadsides and â€œa brothel could open up in the apartment next to yours or in the house next to yours,â€ Falle says.
While prostitution is legal in Canada, running a bawdy house, living off of the avails and soliciting for the purposes of prostitution are not.
â€œIf we legalize these three areas, will brothels be allowed to set up a booth at the high school job fair?â€ she asks.
Just last month, two men were arrested in the Toronto area after recruiting a teenage Windsor girl to work in a strip club. They then took her to Toronto, where they forced her to prostitute herself.
â€œI think many well-meaning Canadians support Bedfordâ€™s challenge against Canadaâ€™s prostitution laws because they believe it will help vulnerable women,â€ Falle says. â€œBut they are mistaken. It will make things much worse. It will legitimize pimping and human trafficking. It will enslave more women and girls.â€
Corbella is right. Â All of the serious research that is out there shows that brothels are violent, violent places where women suffer and are exploited even in places like Nevada where they are illegal. Â This does not help women, it exploits them even more.
Calgary has been accused of being a “bully” for trying to actually enforce our policies (based on the province’s own Water for Life strategy) for responsible water development.
The best example of this occurred in 2011 when the City was asked to provide water and water servicing for a large industrial development outside the city, in Rocky View County. This is precisely the kind of development the Plan envisions, but since the County has not signed onto the Plan, the City’s policy doesn’t allow for it.
But the province, without telling anyone, decided to pay for the water connection itself. The details are unclear, as the province has never publicly released them, but it’s almost certainly true that their solution cost taxpayers millions of dollars more than if they had legislated the Plan, and it’s not at all certain they will ever be able to recoup the cost.
Last week, the Premier met with the council of the Municipal District of Foot-hills (another of the holdouts), and was quoted in the local paper saying that she would not “force” the MD into the Plan (meaning she would not legislate the plan). She also implied that she is not sure the Plan is needed at all. The same day, her Minister backpedalled furiously, saying the Premier’s words did not represent government policy, that the decision was his to make, and that he would continue working to a resolution.
You might forgive me for being a little confused.
What I am not confused about is that the future prosperity of this city is the future prosperity of this province.
Treating the City government as the farm team in this relationship and managing important files as cavalierly as this is not good for Calgary, and it’s certainly not good for Alberta.
It’s weird seeing a mayor take this approach to government relations. Â You see it with the provinces and the feds all of the time but rarely with cities and their province (Toronto would be the only other city that plays hardball with the province). Â In Saskatoon former mayoral candidate was mocked for this desire to be more aggressive in asking the province for more. Â We seem to have resigned ourselves to be reduced to thanking them for government handouts when they are so inclined. Â Nenshi took a different approach and not only got his meeting with Premier Redford but also was offered mediation from the province.Â Â
According to this column by Don Braid, there will be a political cost to pay.
Even as Mayor Naheed Nenshi was being invited to meet with the premier, provincial needling continued Thursday over the city charter.
The PCs donâ€™t forgive readily, and they never forget.
Premier Alison Redford implied that Edmonton Mayor Stephen Mandel co-operates, and Nenshi doesnâ€™t.
She said both Edmonton and Calgary city councils are satisfied with talks on the charter. So is Mandel.
By leaving out Nenshi, she suggests heâ€™s the unreasonable renegade.
In an interview Thursday, the mayor said none of thatâ€™s true. He and Mandel agree on most points of the charter, he insists. Nor is he offside with his own council.
The mayor also points out, correctly, that he never called anybody names in this dispute.
He did say in a Herald op-ed piece that the province is fumbling civic issues and treating Calgary like a â€œfarm team.â€
Technically, he was only calling Calgary a name. But even that mild comment deeply irked the provincial types who, in recent years, have become almost fanatical about suppressing criticism from local municipalities and authorities.
In the midst of this dispute, Municipal Affairs Minister Doug Griffiths said Nenshi has â€œan election coming up; heâ€™s going to puff up like a peacock and be tough.â€
Answering a question Thursday, Griffiths said: â€œIf thereâ€™s tension, itâ€™s on his side. I donâ€™t feel any tension.â€
But the PCs do. They have ever since ex-mayor Dave Bronconnier scared the heck out of them 2007, when he accused then-premier Ed Stelmach of a â€œbroken promiseâ€ over infrastructure funding.
Facing an election, the government had to back up. Bronco won that contest by a knockout. Everybody knew it â€” especially the provincials. They fumed, but didnâ€™t forget.
During the 2008 election campaign, Jack Davis, then CEO of the old Calgary Health Region, declared a medical emergency and demanded extra funding from the government. Again the PCs were livid.
Within four months, the health regions were abolished.
There were many reasons for that decision; but one was the growing tendency of the health regions to speak up about local problems.
It will be interesting to see what this is going to cost Nenshi.
Some sane advice from the Calgary Herald who points out that railing about the Prime Ministerâ€™s use of a Government of Canada Challenger Jet.
All parties have been guilty of this and it is time to stop the partisan finger-pointing. Regardless of what party is in power, the prime minister should be allowed some perks. Harper flew to Boston on the private Challenger jet -for security, the RCMP insists that all prime ministers do so -along with his daughter Rachel and Heritage Minister James Moore, who is from B.C. Good for them.
U.S. presidents go to baseball games and play golf. JFK and Jackie sailed off Nantucket with their kids and nobody raised a fuss. Any leader, left, right, or centre, should be allowed a little leisure time. It’s a brutal job. Prime Ministers are on the job 24/7. Get over it.
Canadians have become so picayune it’s ridiculous. Harper was even criticized for attending the Winter Olympics in Vancouver. What nonsense.
The prime minister’s official residence at 24 Sussex Drive is crumbling and in need of $10 million in repairs. Just do it. We’ve spent more than $1 billion renovating the Parliament Buildings. Good. It’s time for Canadians to take some pride in their official buildings, and in their top elected positions, regardless of political stripe.
I have been on one of the Government of Canadaâ€™s private jets (some photos from the 2006 Canada Remembers Air Show) and itâ€™s not exactly Air Force One. Itâ€™s cramped and uncomfortable and to be honest, a first class flight on an Air Canada Airbus would be more comfortable but itâ€™s done for security reasons but every time it happens, the opposition freaks out over the cost because (gasp) the Prime Minister is having a little fun.
Itâ€™s the same way about 24 Sussex Drive. It needs repairs but no one wants to be the one that says that we need to fix up the place. As Harper said, â€œitâ€™s good enough for meâ€ because of the political attacks that would happen if he was the one that ordered the repairs so we let the official residence of the Prime Minister of Canada deteriorate a little further each year.
Licia Corbella of the Calgary Herald looks at why Michael Ignatieff failed to connect with Canadian voters.
To his baffled Harvard colleagues who can’t understand how a Harvard man can’t beat a University of Calgary man, ask yourselves this: Would any of Ignatieff’s books have won awards if the positions he took waffled as much as his comments to Canadians? Would he have been a popular lecturer? Of course not.
Those of us who had read his work knew he didn’t really believe that Israel was guilty of war crimes, but that he made a calculated decision to throw Israel under the bus to quell a political storm in Quebec while speaking French.
Bob Rae, who was also fighting for the Liberal leadership at the time (which went to Stephane Dion) called Ignatieff "the guy who’s changed his mind three times in a week," with regard to the Lebanese-Israeli war.
Then in 2009, when Ignatieff was Liberal leader, he put forward policies that he clearly didn’t give more than a passing thought to.
Ignatieff wanted Canadians to be eligible to take a year off drawing employment insurance benefits after working just nine weeks.
The very people that was supposed to entice -autoworkers losing their jobs -were outraged. Why should some student whose summer job comes to an end get to draw EI benefits for the same amount of time as that autoworker who has paid into the system for decades?
For years, Ignatieff waxed poetic about how valuable the oilsands were to all of Canada, and then during the campaign, instead of supporting his very valid views, he spoke of how he would place a moratorium on development of our "dirty oil" and bring in a cap-and-trade system.
Ignatieff didn’t resonate with voters because he was a sycophant. He said what he thought people wanted to hear and thought Canadian voters are too stupid to know good policy from bad.
I am not really sure if that was it. Early on the in the election, Canadians tuned into Ignatieff and seemed to like him and his platform. Even out west, people seemed to like the Liberal platform, yet didnâ€™t vote for them. Part of me wonders the impact the horrible state of the Liberal Party’s grassroots in parts of Canada played a part, the other part of me wonders if his attempt to bring down the government last year had an impact. While in Ottawa it may have played well, the rest of us in Canada were really tired to it. So Harper brings out a budget that isnâ€™t that bad and before it comes out, Ignatieff is saying his is going to bring down the government. Meanwhile the rest of us are thinking, â€œArenâ€™t governmentâ€™s supposed to fall on really big issues and mistakes, not on the Opposition Leaderâ€™s rhetoric?â€.
I donâ€™t watch a lot of Canadian television and the Conservatives donâ€™t advertise on History Channel so I donâ€™t know if I saw the â€œjust visitingâ€ ads and I donâ€™t think I was influenced by them but after Ignatieff said he be was bringing down the government in 2010, he sounded like a political opportunist, meanwhile Layton who occasionally propped up Harper (and â€œMade Parliament workâ€) seemed more and more like the government in waiting. As that happened, I found myself ignoring Ignatieff more and more.
So whatâ€™s your reason for not supporting the Liberal Party?