Cosmo Industries is upset with the City of Saskatoon City Council. I am to but for totally different reasons. Saskatoon doesnâ€™t have a minor league ball team, the Riders donâ€™t hold their training camp in Saskatoon anymore, there is a massive pothole on a street I drive to work on. The list goes on.
Cosmoâ€™s complaint seems to revolve around the fact that they have a contract for paper collection in the city and that contract is now in jeopardy because of the cities move to curbside recycling. As The StarPhoenixâ€™s Dave Hutton writes.
Cosmo issued a news release Tuesday, stating that "adults with intellectual disabilities are shut out from benefiting from the future economic and population growth in Saskatoon."
In a report, the city guarantees Cosmo 7,800 tonnes of paper fibre each year for the next seven years, the remainder of a 10-year contract. The amount of paper fibre Cosmo has received from the depots has ranged from roughly 6,500 in 2005 to 7,800 tonnes in 2010, around 41 per cent of total paper fibre in the waste stream. The city projected the amount to decrease because of more households signing up for private curbside collection and a move to digital media.
When a curbside system is installed in 2012, the depot system will remain intact, but the amount of paper coming from the depots is expected to decrease substantially. In a report, the city says it will provide the 7,800 tonnes to Cosmo by delivering the remainder of paper from depots and large organizations. The city also says it will ask bidders to provide pricing for the city to buy raw paper fibre from them and deliver it to Cosmo to meet the contract requirements.
Ken Gryschuk, community relations manager for Cosmo, said the organization projected the amount of paper received through depots to increase to 10,000 tonnes through 2018.
They are so upset they are not threatening to sue but want to talk to their lawyers about it.
Gryschuk said he still thinks there is time to amend the agreement. He said Cosmo "is not contemplating a lawsuit" but is getting a legal opinion on the status of the contract with the city.
"I do not believe that this is over," he said. "What was done last night does not reflect the will of the people of Saskatoon."
I am a part of a non-profit who deals with the Government of Saskatchewan and one thing I have learned is that essentially I work at the leisure of the Government of Saskatchewan and can be shut down or impacted negatively at any time. This week I have spent pouring over budget information and made the hard decision to (hopefully temporarily) cut positions at the shelter. Itâ€™s hard and it is largely a result in a government policy shift in how they want to handle their department. The Centre has lost funding for programs before and I am sure it will lose funding for programs in the future. Other agencies have gone through the same thing. While I understand the frustration that those who run Cosmo Industries must feel, it is the same for everyone. Market conditions changed and Cosmo is going to have to adjust.
The same for us. Housing FIrst programs are dealing with homelessness far better than shelters have and so we prepare for the day when sheltering is going to be a lot less important than assisted living and SROs. Itâ€™s been difficult in other cities as at the Booth Centre in Calgary where a change in the environment has been met with layoffs.
Itâ€™s a hard decision for city council but what Cosmo Industries wanted would have frozen the city in time. Here is how Gerry Klein sees it.
The monkey-wrench in the works, however, is a belief by Cosmo industries that to move on could cost the organization access to the paper that makes it work. To allay these fears, Coun. Lorje in January proposed – and council unanimously agreed – that any new system should be designed to protect Cosmo’s interests.
That turned the debate to whether the status quo was protection enough. Half of council and the civic administration believed that guaranteeing Cosmo a minimum volume of paper – the 7,800 tonnes or so it now receives – should allow the enterprise to continue by maintaining the current level of employment for its clients.
Cosmo, however, wants a bigger cut of the action. If this were about any other recyclable material, it probably wouldn’t have mattered much. But paper is where the money is in recycling.
Every non-profit wants to do more to help itâ€™s clients. Without a doubt Cosmo could hire more people and help more if they got up to 10,000 tonnes of paper a year but all non-profits can do the same if given more resources. Cosmo is going to have to diversify, expand, retool, and reimagine themselves. They have had a great ride, built a great legacy, and have goodwill in the community. Trashing city council for not allowing them to continue their monopoly isnâ€™t the way to go. Figuring out their next market is what they need to be doing.