In Saskatoonâ€”Humboldt there has been a lot of controversy over incumbent MP Brad Trostâ€™s pro-life view and his statements to a pro-life rally that Planned Parenthood had been defunded. Iâ€™ll let the Globe and Mail give you the details.
â€œDo you support a womanâ€™s right to choose for an abortionist to kill her unborn child?â€ Denise Hounjet-Roth, 53, a retired teacher and staunch Roman Catholic, asked the candidates.
Such sentiments are what have sent Mr. Trost, a 36-year-old geophysicist, to Ottawa. He won a narrow race in 2004, when just 435 votes separated the Conservative, New Democrat and Liberal candidates. Since then, heâ€™s won easily.
Naturally, his opponents are targeting his beliefs, saying the riding is filled with voters who are no longer stirred by questions of abortion and same-sex marriage.
This has been a complex issue for a long time for me. At my heart I am a libertarian but I am also an evangelical Christian (albeit a part of the evangelical left) I have spent years pondering the issue and now more than ever I believe life begins at conception. On a personal level Wendy and I had that decision personalized when Oliverâ€™s birth jeopardized Wendyâ€™s life. There was a question at one point of who do we save? (you have never made a hard decision until you have been asked that one)
A couple of years ago Warren Kinsella made a comment on his blog about right to life people in both parties and I replied in the comments, â€œthere are those of a liberal political ideology who do believe that life does begin at conceptionâ€. Just as there are committed Christians who believe that women have a right to choose. I am not sure if the question will be relevant in Heaven but if it is, we may have to wait until we get there to find out.
Years ago I had a conversation with Tony Campolo who pointed out that during Clintonâ€™s presidency, abortion levels in the United States dropped sharply, this was during an era which made it easier for women to get safe abortions. So access to safe abortions was made easier and yet the number of abortions went down. Campolo credited an era of relative prosperity, a rise of income among lower class, the rise of Promise Keepers who preached that men need to take responsibility for their actions and embrace fatherhood, and a variety of initiatives that made it easier for women to take care of their children.
He (along with Jim Wallis) wrote the Democratic Party platform on the area of abortion in which they called for ways to reduce abortions rather than overturn Roe vs. Wade. Ever since I became aware of Roe vs. Ware, I have long wondered if the resources targeted towards electing conservative candidates and presidents, lobbying for certain judicial picks and lobbying for certain Supreme Court justices had been instead allocated into programs making it easier for women to bring the babies to termâ€¦
Thatâ€™s where I am at. Personally I hate the idea of an unborn child being born but we live in a country that has decriminalized it. I worked on the campaign of the Minister of Justice who paid a tremendous price for doing it (and we as a family lost some friends because of our support for the former Governor General). Instead of trying to turn back the clock to 1984 (when Tories could be red), how about working in the context that we live in now? This is where the social conservatives drive me crazy with their inconsistency. Paul Begala says it this way. If you are going to be pro-life, be consistently pro-life. Feel free to oppose abortions as Begala does but also be against capital punishment, euthanasia, and be a pacifist. Work on policies that make a difference for those who are afflicted. Most social conservatives are fine with Canada going to war and capital punishment and I donâ€™t see a lot of policies easing the afflictions of poverty.
If you are going to be pro-life, be pro-life. This isnâ€™t just about Trost, itâ€™s about evangelical Christians who love to preach about abortion but spend a pittance in supporting projects that make a real difference. I am reminded of Duke theologian Richard Hays remarks in a Cutting Edge interview in which he said one of the reasons that evangelicals go on and on about homosexuality is that it doesnâ€™t cost them anything. I think the same can be said about the opposition to abortion, especially from men. Itâ€™s something to get upset about, it raises money, and it offends very few people (or so they think) in the pews. Even when churches do take action it isnâ€™t action. A church I know of takes an offering of loonies and toonies to support local poverty initiatives. The idea is that your real offering goes to the budget of the church, the change in your purse or pocket can go to these other people, a theology that I really struggle with.
The same conversation I had with Tony Campolo about abortion, he told me about a conversation he had with then President Bill Clinton and his veto of some anti-abortion legislation. Campolo pointed out that the Senate should and would send the abortion legislation right back at him (he used a lot more colorful language than that). Clinton laughed and told Campolo he was beling naive. The Republicans will wait until the last possible momentâ€¦ when it helps then nominee George W. Bush and hurts Al Gore the most. Clinton was right. It was at that time that he realized that many members of the Senate donâ€™t care about abortion as a moral issue but as a wedge political issue, a thought that has stuck with me ever since then.
So here is my deal. Iâ€™ll start to pay attention to any politician that takes a stand against abortion, not as an electoral issue but works hard for legislation that helps those at the most risk of having abortions and for those children who are having their future stolen away because of living in extreme poverty, lack of education, FASD, unsafe foster care (Iâ€™m talking to you Saskatchewan Party and Saskatchewan NDP MLAs), and even swings a hammer or hangs some drywall at a Egadz MyHome. Iâ€™ll pay attention to politicians who fight for the elimination of child poverty, fights to ensure that schools on the west side of the city have the same resources as those on the east side, and fight to make sure that food safety programs are funded. As long as I see kids (and I mean girls younger than the age of consent) on the streets because their parents put them there or because there isnâ€™t any food in the house and I donâ€™t see you fighting whoever is standing in your way, I will never take you seriously. For years I grew up grimacing when I saw the orange NDP lawn sign on my pastorâ€™s lawn. As a kid I was thinking, â€œThey are pro-abortion. How can he support that?â€ I never clicked in that progressive policies towards eliminating poverty make a far greater difference than restrictive legislation any day.
Itâ€™s not just the politicians. Itâ€™s churches, itâ€™s pro-life groups, itâ€™s anyone who wants to use this as a wedge issue. The fact is that many abortions take place because women donâ€™t feel that they have an option. Taking away that doesnâ€™t solve the problem. What we need to do as a society is to create more choices which allow women to carry the kids to term and know that they will have a brighter future whether in their home or someone elseâ€™s home.
Now regarding the defunding Planned Parenthood that is (supposedly) happening in Canada and other jurisdictions in the United States where they elect Republicans. Planned Parenthood clinics use the government money for pelvic exams, breast exams, safer-sex counselling and basic infertility counselling, among other things. Things like thisâ€¦
So whatâ€™s the point of the video? STIâ€™s are not an issue in the small conservative towns that make up the rural parts of Saskatoonâ€”Humboldt but it is a big part of Saskatoonâ€™s inner city where we have some of the highest STI infection rates in the country. In some age demographics, well over 50% over sexually active women have HPV. Any one night at work, we house numerous, numerous men who have both diagnosed/undiagnosed and treated/untreated HIV/AIDS. Support for them and the prevention is also being unfunded. It seems like an attack not only abortions but also a womenâ€™s right to chose birth control or the right to have safe sex. From here you have upper class men telling women how they can live their lives, even how they can have sex.
There is another way. Fund Planned Parenthood. Even if you have to hold your noses while doing it. At the same time increase funding to places like the Saskatoon Food Bankâ€¦ even set up special programs there for infantsâ€¦ fund programs like the Saskatoon Friendship Inn and others that do a good job in helping people make ends meet. Fund Catholic Family Services and a bunch of other programs that make life easier for those who at the most risk of having an abortion and give women other viable options to get through tough times, expand their education, get good jobs, have support while working. Maybe it will take universal childcare, a version of Head Start or maybe you may have to chat with Liberals and NDP to get ideas but take those steps to create a Canada that is pro-life (and not just anti-abortion) for everyone and abortion numbers will drop.
When Conservative (or Liberal) politicians want to start working on a true pro-life agenda, an agenda that values all lives, Iâ€™ll start to talk and even listen, until that, I just see it as wedge politics, something that works in a riding as polarized as Saskatoonâ€”Humboldt. Wedge politics work. Karl Rove made it into an art form. You may win pulling it off, actually if you chose correctly, you will almost always win but the country or your riding is worse off because of it because it creates winners and a lot of losers.
The funny things is that Trost doesnâ€™t even have to win this way. Before the topic of abortion and social conservatism came up, he had developed a reputation as a MP that worked hard on constituent concerns and was the guy that saved us from Jim Pankiw. That has now changed. Hopefully in the next parliament, Trost will expand his worldview and focus on more than defunding Planned Parenthood and instead focus on creating a Canadian culture where everyone has a chance at a better life.