The Brand Called Obama
Okay, three Fast Company posts in a row. They also profile the branding of Barack Obama. Not a lot new here but it does explain why Obama does so well among the digital class.
|
Blog
Okay, three Fast Company posts in a row. They also profile the branding of Barack Obama. Not a lot new here but it does explain why Obama does so well among the digital class. Al Gore's new presentation of An Inconvenient Truth that was recently given at TED. Labels: environment, ideas, media, video We are showing some movies at the shelter on Saturday nights for the guys who call this place home. We are starting out with the Star Wars series and then hitting Star Trek (Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan!) pretty hard. After that I have some ideas on what films I want to show (The Mission, Batman Begins) but I was wondering if you had any suggestions. I am actually thinking of doing some documentaries like Ken Burn's The War this summer and maybe even Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel to change the pace a bit. (documentaries are quite popular in our television lounge). I think there is some sort of law that a couple of John Wayne movies need to be shown as well. If you have any suggestions on some movies that would be appropriate for guys in the shelter, let me know in the comments. My only caveat is no nudity or gratuitous violence. Karen over at Beyond Magazine is posting about how to make a magazine and today she is posting on the joys of getting a magazine out to bookstores. So, in our case, what's left from each sale of an ads-free Beyond in bookstores is LESS than what the magazine costs to produce. Which means bookstore distribution costs us money. Which means it doesn't make much sense to distribute Beyond through bookstores. Which means we send very few copies to them. Which means, your best bet is to get Beyond here. Speaking of Beyond, you can see the latest issue in this Flickr set. It gives you an idea of why it is an award winning magazine. Labels: media The media empire behind Beyond Magazine has been busy lately. They have shipped the latest version of their award winning arts magazine, updated the look and feel of their site, and now has a mailing list to keep you updated on what is new in the land of Beyond. So if you are a friend of Beyond, drop on by and leave your e-mail address. That way when they take over the world, they know who to install as puppet leaders, that and you will know how when new issues come out, things are added to the site, and upcoming Beyond events. Labels: friends, media, technology Okay, back to the War Room. Lesson Four is why and how you need to get your money out with paid media. It's an interesting chapter if you are a fan of political history and offers the background into how political advertising evolved over time. Kinsella talks about Daisy, perhaps my favorite part of Kicking Ass in Canadian Politics. Of course the important lesson from Daisy is not that you need to convince your opponent that he or she will lead us to nuclear war but rather that advertising can reinforce an idea that is already in voters mind about your opponent. If you have never seen Daisy, it is embedded there to the right. This started me thinking about two recent negative campaigns across the country. The first one is the Conservative Party's Not a Leader campaign directed at Stephane Dion. Several pundits have said that this has hurt Stephane Dion and has allowed him to be framed by the Conservatives. While I saw the commercials and thought they were well done, I didn't think that they were that accurate. In the Chretien cabinets I thought Dion was quite effective. The timing was brilliant in that he had just won a hard fought leadership campaign and the party was divided. Capitalizing on the internal dissension which is a normal part of politics, the Conservatives used the opportunity to attack and used the words of his own leadership rival and Dion's words against him. The Liberals either facing a shortage of cash or didn't have an operating war room to strike back quickly didn't follow James Carville's rule and didn't hit back and now many think that the charges laid by those ads has stuck. They did run their own ad several weeks later but by that time, "Not a leader" had done it's job. The second campaign I keep thinking back to the recent Saskatchewan election and the NDP Wolf is sheep's clothing advertising campaign. While the ads were hard hitting, they had no impact on the election or the polls and even NDP members I knew didn't care for them. People didn't believe that Brad Wall was like Grant Devine and b) we couldn't figure out why it was necessary to bad mouth Alberta all of the time. The other thing is that the Saskatchewan Party did hit back with a pretty good ad of their own. Their counterattack ad which came out soon after the NDP spot aired did got in a shot of their own that did articulate what many people in Saskatchewan thought. Again, even die hard NDP commented to me that they thought the spot was excellent. Both of those examples feature negative ads which makes sense because as Kinsella points out on page 123, negative ads work. There are two reasons for this. First, television is an emotional medium, and emotional messages work best with voters. "With too much information around," the professors wrote, "our senses are overloaded and advertisers have turned away from information imparting ads to an approach that 'goes for the gut,' appealing to core values... Negative ads are crafted in the best dramatic tradition: they contain characterization (implicit or explicit), plot and conflict." Second, they wrote, negative ads work because they are negative. "Simply put, negative information is more powerful in crystallizing decisions than positive information. In politics, it is said, 'mud sticks' and negative ads are the way in which seeds of doubt about an opponent are introduced and negative perceptions are reinforced" Okay that all makes sense but this is supposed to be a review from a NGO point of view and my advertising budget is pretty small with not a lot of cash for negative ad buys. How do I get my message out? How do I survive in the data smog that is today's media market? As I was thinking about this while reading the next part of the lesson on how to do a ad buy when I got distracted by an article on how much it was going to cost for the Democratic and GOP candidates to do ad buys in all the February 5 state primaries. They are confronted by the same problems that I had. Too much message, not enough money to get it out. As I looked around at the Sask Party and Saskatchewan NDP YouTube sites it hit me that this for NGO's, this is where much of the media efforts are going to be. It won't replace advertising during Hockey Night in Canada or the Grey Cup but it is a distribution system that does have some power that is going to grow. The NGO's are not the only ones who are discovering this, Tony Blair launched Labour Vision on YouTube (whose main video has Gordon Brown now claiming credit for it) The often stodgy Conservative Party has one. The Archbishop of Canterbury is using it. Even Hillary Clinton is creating ads just for the web. If The War Room is a partial update to Kicking Ass, I imagine that the next update will feature not just a ad buy guide for network and cable audience but one for the web as well. Before you guffaw, before long everyone will have moved to a smart phone or media device like a iPod Touch which include YouTube capabilities. In case you haven't heard, a tiny company called Google is getting into the mobile phone market. Do you think that phone may have YouTube built into it as well? I am not saying that television is going away but it is going to be increasingly hard to ignore the impact of YouTube and Google Video in the future. Some more about this will be said when I get to Lesson Nine but if I was running a lot of organizations, I would start thinking long and hard about how you use video, how one creates a network to get the word out, and how that can grow, even if a Super Bowl commercial isn't in the works. Book Information The War Room: Political Strategies for Business, NGOs, and Anyone Who Wants to Win by Warren Kinsella Labels: book reviews, books, media, politics Labels: media, Salvation Army, Saskatoon, work In case you haven't done so, head on over to Beyond's website and subscribe. Your subscription supports what Utne thinks is one of the best designed independent magazines out there. Despite all of the hype about Facebook (which I find invasive), there are some other web apps out there that are worth a look at to help a church or non-profit connect with people online. Below are five of my favorites and some ideas on how they could be (better) used. That's my list. Add some of yours below in the comments. Labels: church, communications, community, culture, emerging church, ideas, media, photography, Resonate, technology Labels: jordoncooper.com, media Labels: media Labels: media, politics, Saskatchewan Twitter's basic idea has proven so popular that others have copied its premise and added features. Jaiku lets me include blog posts, my link blog, and more along with my mini posts. Pownce users can send files to one another, as well as calendar events. At Facebook, I can add such information as my favorite music and the syndicated Web feeds I've shared in Google Reader. All this adds up to a new way to share information about yourself. Although the content of the messages can vary wildly from voyeuristically interesting to terribly Labels: communications, media, technology Americans aren't the only ones with a fetish for bumper stickers: Israelis, Australians and not a few Europeans are known to favour them, too. Therein, perhaps, lies clues as to the bumper sticker's popularity -- they seem to flourish in feisty, robust democracies, where free expression is cherished. As ineffective as they may be in actually moving public opinion, the public are glad that bumper stickers allow them to quickly express an opinion. Does this mean that Canada lacks a feisty, robust democracy? That we do not value free expression as much as the Americans, or the Australians, or the Israelis? That we fear governmental rebukes and recrimination, and stuff like that? No, it's nothing like that. Canadians are a modest, quieter sort of people. We value free expression, to be sure, but we apparently value one thing even more above that: resale value. After all, why should we do anything that makes it tougher to sell one's vehicle? Canadian winters, road salt and black ice are bad enough. Why make a bad situation worse? Give your heads a shake, Yankees! Exactly. Labels: communications, media The Ottawa Citizen tries to make sense of the Conservative Party sponsoring a NASCAR car. The Tories already have a relatively solid grip on the blue-collar, male demographic that comprises the core audience for stock car racing. And although NASCAR claims 75 million North American fans -- including about 5.8 million in Canada -- the small-time Canadian circuit, with shorter tracks and a shorter season, more typically attracts audiences of about 5,000 to 10,000 fans, according to Mr. Novotny. "Our circuit is sort of like the minors in hockey. The junior system that feeds into the majors eventually," he explains. Furthermore, while the "NASCAR dads" comprise a strong Republican party force in the U.S., that sort of narrowly segmented approach to the electorate is of dubious value in Canada. "That sort of tight demographic focus works in the U.S. where there's very low voter turnout and you have to target who to motivate at the polls," says Peter Donolo, who was communications director for former prime minister Jean Chretien and is now with Strategic Counsel in Toronto. "Canadians are a lot more label-resistant. They tend to defy that type of facile characterization." He notes the Tories are "preaching to the converted" in gender terms as well, since their support already skews heavily to men -- as do NASCAR events. Even if the GOP did sponsor a NASCAR car, would it make you change your vote or even consider voting for another party? Labels: Canada, communications, hockey, media, politics Labels: church, communications, media, Saskatoon |
welcome Follow
the site via RSS
You may also be interested in my thoughts on what I am reading, the emerging church, or what contextless things I am linking to. currently
enjoying
» Beyond Magazine »
Daniel Miller »
Gloria
Reimer »
Jamie Arpin-Ricci
» Len Hjalmarson
» Mark Scandrette »
Randall Friesen
» Scott Williams »
Today
at the Mission »
Warren Kinsella
currently
enjoying |
|
jordoncooper.com
|
Thanks for stopping by! |
|
web
|
blog
|
|
social
media
|
flickr
|
|
content
|
writing | resources | emerging church | quote library |
|
info
|
biography | contact | disclosure |
|
|