JordonCooper.com Rotating Header Image

Saskatoon

What’s next

So for those of you who follow me on Twitter know, I resigned from my job at The Lighthouse Supported Living Inc. this week.  Of course being me, I did this without another job to go to but that happens sometimes.  Yes it is a terrifying move as working in shelters is not a profession that is bank account friendly.

It means that I am now in search of a job.  Financially we are okay because Wendy has worked at Safeway for 15 years and is still under their old collective bargaining tier which means that she makes a decent salary.  This gives me some flexibility in knowing that we can get by on minimum wage if needed although I really don’t want to do that.

Since 2005 I have been working with the homeless and hard to house and while I love it, there has been some really hard days along the way as well.  If I have an opportunity to go back into it, i will but I am always ready for a new challenge that doesn’t involve dirty needles, death threats, and the pain and suffering that I have seen day in and out over the last 8 years.

If you want to hire me, check out my LinkedIn profile at www.linkedin.com/in/jordoncooper.  I am proud of the work that I have done and I think that I have a lot to give but it will be somewhere else now.

If there is one thing I like about me, it’s that I have enjoyed my jobs.  I have worked retail and loved the interactions.  I have worked in very difficult situations and loved the challenges.  Not a lot of people know this but I started mopping floors at The Salvation Army and I liked that as well.   I think I am also lucky in that I am not defined by my job which makes it easier to step back.  That being said, I have a lot of experience doing what I do so there is a nice comfort zone there.

If you are hiring (we would consider moving) or know of a job, let me know at jordoncooper@gmail.com.

Story of Homelessness in Saskatoon

If you want to know what being homeless in Saskatoon looks and sounds like, it sounds like Rhoda.

Initiative takes aim at prostitution in Canada

From The StarPhoenix

About 15 per cent of men pay for sex, according to statistics compiled by Melissa Farley at the Prostitution Research and Education website.

The majority of these men are 24 to 27 years old, fathers and college-educated men.

Statistics like this are one reason why the Christian & Missionary Alliance denomination established a justice initiative known as Defend Dignity to address the issue of prostitution and lobby for its abolition in Canada.

“We call ourselves an abolitionist organization,” Rev. Tyrone McKenzie, pastor of Lawson Heights Alliance Church, says. “Our aim is to get a groundswell of support for the issue by making connections with churches, women’s and faith-based groups, and non-governmental organizations.”

Defend Dignity came out of the work Regina-born Glendyne Gerrard was doing in C&MA women’s ministry and her personal experiences connecting with poor and oppressed women. Gerrard is now Defend Dignity’s director.

“She kept coming in contact with women affected by prostitution,” McKenzie says, “and as that contact grew, Defend Dignity became an organization of its own.”

Defend Dignity focuses on advocacy at the local and national level. The group works to connect locally with informational forums in churches across the country, and federally with members of Parliament. The organization has strong ties with the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, which does most of the work at the federal level.

EFC’s political analyst Julia Beazley will be in Saskatoon to speak at a Defend Dignity forum being held on Sunday at Circle Drive Alliance Church, beginning at 6 p.m.

Amanda Stephenson, one of the event organizers, says the forum is travelling to a dozen cities across Canada. In Saskatchewan, Defend Dignity will hold events in Regina, Prince Albert and Saskatoon.

A group of experts will speak on the topic of prostitution in Canada. One of the speakers is Beatrice Littlechief, a former prostitute who is now an emergency services manager at Soul’s Harbour, a rescue mission in Regina. Other speakers include a police officer from Calgary, a political analyst, a representative from the Missing and Murdered Aboriginal Women organization, and Jordon Cooper from The Lighthouse in Saskatoon.

A number of civic, provincial and federal politicians will also be in attendance to hear what the general public has to say on the issue.

“The purpose of the event is to get information out there,” Stephenson says. “People attending can participate by texting their questions throughout the event and having them answered by the panel.”

Stephenson says there will be a networking component to the evening, as “10 different local organizations, including The Lighthouse, The Bridge, Salvation Army and John School (which rehabilitates johns) will be on site with information booths.”

McKenzie says the biggest reason he is involved in Defend Dignity is because it is evident in scripture that Jesus cared for women who were affected by prostitution and sexual exploitation.

“As a follower of Christ, I, too, need to have compassion and advocate for victims of violence and prostitution,” he says. “The second reason is that there is a real need for men in our congregations to come to grips with the issue of pornography, which drives the whole prostitution industry. I find the statistics on pornography to be shocking.

“If I could do one day over again, it would be the day nude pictures flashed around playground in Grade 5. For many men, that was their first exposure to pornography, and in one way or another, they were affected. I believe no matter where we’ve encountered pornography, we can address the topic and take steps toward personal healing and wholeness. In our congregation, we’re trying to provide a solution for our men by getting them involved in the Harbour of Hope at The Lighthouse doing handyman renovations.”

One member of Parliament told the group if 50 MPs received 60 letters a month on a particular issue, and seven to 10 personal visits, that could be enough impetus for the government to put the issue at the top of its agenda. The event will provide an opportunity to write letters on the subject of prostitution to MPs, the prime minister and the minister of justice.

Stephenson says Sunday’s forum is free and open to everyone.

“We’re encouraging youth and young adults to make it a priority,” she says. “I grew up in Saskatoon and lived a very sheltered life. I didn’t know the realities of trafficking and prostitution until a couple of years ago.

“So many people, especially in the church, don’t want to admit it exists. But it does. This event is purely educational, to let people know what’s happening in our city.”

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

A new contract with citizens for building a great city.

This is from Charlie Clark

I believe that the way forward is to work out a plan that lays out clearly our approach to approving services, a discussion about options for how to pay for this, and then a much improved communication approach that lays out clearly what we will get from the choices we make. I also think we need to set some measurable targets to show that we are achieving results. Snow clearing is but one piece of the puzzle. This year we have had the second highest number of watermain breaks in the 35 years of recorded history on this for example – so we need also to have a look at the big picture and make sure we aren’t just reacting to whatever is most visible.

While I have heard from many people the view that if we weren’t doing things like building the new Art Gallery or River Landing that we wouldn’t have these challenges. Yes the Art Gallery will require an increase in the amount of funding coming from property taxes – this is a signature project for the City. When stacked up against costs like the South Bridge or even building a single overpass it becomes clearer that this one project will have little impact on the overall bottom line of the City – especially with the money coming from fundraising and other levels of government.

That being said – I remain of the view that quality of life comes from attending to our hearts and minds as well as our car tires. If we want our young people to decide to stay here, and we want to continue to attract people to live here – we have to offer more than just cleaner roads. All evidence points to this, and any review of even just neighbouring prairie cities will show that they also are investing in arts and culture along with concrete and asphalt. We ignore this at our own peril.

I hope to carry on the conversation about this with you in the next months and years as we determine the best way forward in building a City that we all feel proud to live in and excited to show off to our guests.

I really like this and it makes a lot of sense.  Clark is on to something here with this contract as he asks the question, do we want really low taxes or do we want to use this time to build a great and enduring city.

Saskatoon House Price increase vs. Income Increases

NewImage

This chart says it all.  I have seen it in a series of City of Saskatoon presentations but you can read it in this report by the City of Saskatoon.  The bottom line is the key.  Incomes are flat.  House prices are soaring.  The boom isn’t being shared by all.  There is more context in the 2012 Saskatoon Housing Business Plan (and an updated chart)

NewImage

 You can compare our household income growth to other cities here (we do quite well) but the problem is that relative to our housing costs, we are not doing well at all.   Take a look at the StatsCan 

 

Column: Heavy Prices Paid for Low Taxes

My column in today’s The StarPhoenix

If you happened to have watched the discussions during last week’s city council meeting about snow removal and business taxes in Saskatoon, you would have left with a clear impression: The city is having a hard time paying for basic services.

Lost in the rhetoric over how hard city crews work and how bad was the winter is a simple fact. Council voted against residential snow removal last fall, which created this mess in the first place. Even last week there were news stories about impassable streets.

The reason that councillors voted against residential snow removal was to keep property taxes as low as possible. As the city has proudly proclaimed for years, Saskatoon has the lowest property taxes in Canada among cities of a similar size.

That’s great if you hate taxes. But it’s bad news if you have to pay for things. With taxes this low, you will always have problems with paying for essential services.

If we are going to be the city of the lowest taxes, we will be the city of no snow removal, constant potholes and inferior public transit, because all of those services cost money. We have to cut costs somewhere, and we have cut them on snow removal and on road repair.

We underfund our road maintenance by more than $12 million a year, and that is just to keep our streets at their current levels. To actually repair and upgrade them would cost much more. Instead of paving roads, we patch them, which allows for moisture penetration. With the freeze-thaw cycle that faces Saskatoon regularly, our streets will continue to fail.

To its credit, council has increased spending on road repair, so by 2020 we will have almost reached the levels needed to keep our streets at 2012 levels. By that time the city will need even more money for road repairs, even if the streets are gravel.

Of course we can raise taxes. However, the problem is that once you go on and on about how low your taxes are, it’s really difficult to back away from that. We can talk all we want about wanting to be a world-class city, but you never judge a government by what it says so much as where it spends its money. In Saskatoon’s case, it’s not enough even to maintain our essential services.

There are two ways to deal with this.

One is to cut back more services and get out of a lot of what the city does, such as affordable housing, building parks and funding art galleries. The focus will be solely on roads, snow removal, emergency services and utilities such as garbage pickup.

This approach provides a great value for those that don’t need social services or amenities. They get lower taxes with no noticeable impact on their life in the city. It’s a blueprint that a lot of American cities have adopted. The problem is that no one wants to live or work in those cities once the boom is over.

The other option is to do what Edmonton’s city council just did. It adopted a report titled, The Way We Prosper, which made it clear that the old way using low taxes to attract business isn’t working.

Competitive taxes are important, but they are only a piece of the puzzle. Issues such as building a livable city and integrating Edmonton’s economic development agencies in a better way were listed as higher priorities.

Cities grow because of external market forces. More important than low taxes are the commodity prices that are driving our economy. If these prices bottom out, there is little that low tax rates will do to keep or attract businesses.

On the flip side, companies and people aren’t coming to Saskatoon because of low taxes on properties and businesses. They are coming because Saskatoon is a gateway to a whole lot of prosperity.

For all of Saskatoon’s aspirations of becoming a world-class city, we aren’t even raising enough money to maintain the city we have. Pat Hyde, manager of the city’s public works branch, announced last week that this will be the worst year ever for potholes.

When you don’t bring in enough money to maintain and clear streets, it’s going to be this bad for a lot of years.

There is a reason why our taxes are so low compared to other cities. Those cities know they can’t maintain their assets and provide services at the tax rates the city is charging.

This paper has called for an alternative to property taxes to fund civic services. Until that happens, we need to start charging more unless we want to see a further deterioration in the state of Saskatoon’s infrastructure. It’s a bill that needs to be paid sometime. As much as we hate it, it will require the payment of higher taxes.

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

Does growth pay for growth?

Excellent article by Charles Hamilton in The StarPhoenix

It’s a question cities throughout Western Canada have been grappling with for decades: does new development pay for itself ? Does the city spend more money servicing new neighbourhoods than it collects from the developers who buy the lots and build houses?

A new report released by Saskatoon civic administrators that says not all costs of new suburban development are paid for by the service rates charged to developers is stirring up the debate.

“Most of the direct services – most of the capital costs to build a neighbourhood – are included in the overall developers’ fees, but there are a number things that are not covered like leisure centres and fire halls and other things,” said Randy Grauer, Saskatoon’s acting city manager.

Some cities, such as Calgary, have decided to dramatically increase development levies. Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi says it’s an attempt to recoup the real cost of growth.

Some planners in Saskatoon say the same model should be considered here as the city’s population continues to grow at a rapid pace.

“The city has been encouraging developers to go develop on the outskirts, and now we are paying for it because we cannot afford to maintain the infrastructure,” said Avi Akkerman, a professor of regional and urban planning at the University of Saskatchewan.

“Everything that is associated with it is unsustainable.”

Of course developers disagree

“The new areas are paying a large portion of the tax burden,” said local developer Ron Olson, a former president the Canadian Home Builders Association. “The new areas are subsidizing the older neighbourhoods.”

Olson said city planners have to be careful not to “drink the Kool-Aid on this densification.” Restricting development on the outer edges of the city will only force young families to move outside the city – to places like Warman and Martensville – where they can find more housing choices.

“Calgary is a prime example of what we are talking about. The mayor has decided that new growth and suburban growth is a bad thing, and that kind of policy is regressive. You will have a bunch of satellites around Calgary, and those satellites are because young people want to live in single family homes,” Olson said.

Actually I would challenge Ron Olson’s assertions about Calgary.  I would suggest that the Calgary satellite communities have everything to do with house price than a desire to live in single family homes.  The farther you are away from Calgary (or Saskatoon), the less access you have to amenities and then less you have to pay for housing.

Of course the other point is that it isn’t about housing, it is about the cities ability to pay for sprawling infrastructure.  It’s weird but some still see libertarian values as something that needs to be met, even in the city.

The Backlot Tour of City Hall

The other day I was asked with some others by Councillor Zach Jeffries if I wanted to go on a tour of City Hall.  I have been in a lot of City Hall over the years but I realized that it was the boring parts (although I did see Mayor Atchison’s office when I interviewed him).  Here are the highlights.

I parked in the City Council parking lot.  It felt like a crime.

On the hallway to the committee rooms and offices are old City Council photos.  We spent most of the time looking at those and seeing how every changed over the years.  Some lost weight, some put it on.  Others looked like they were 12 when elected to office (not naming any names)

We saw the cubicle farm that councillors call home.  They get 1/2 of one cubicle but it’s a small cubicle.  When you think of it, each councillor gets about 1/3 of a cubicle.  Only Councillor Loewen and Jeffries don’t have to share (anti social behaviour maybe).  They also have a small shared boardroom which if it was a stand alone office, would be small.  The cupboard was… well your judge it for yourself.…  Your tax dollars are not being spent on opulent furnishings for City Council.

Of course anyone who has ever watched Council live is curious about the small room behind council chambers.  For me, it was kind of like the teacher’s lounge, it was a place of mystery and intrigue.  I was wrong.  It is a small sitting room with bad art on the walls.  There is a pop fridge in there so if anything when your favourite councillor is ducking out of the action, he or she is getting a Fanta or a Tab.

The coolest part of the trip by far was when Councillor Jeffries showed us the maps that are hanging all over city hall.  We spent the longest looking at the 1913 Yorath Plan.

1913 YORATH PLANClick here for larger version

When Mayor Atchison is talking about waiting 100 years to complete Circle Drive, this is the plan that he is talking about.  Circle Drive was referred to as a boulevard but it does span the city.   C.J. Vorath was a map maker, not a wordsmith and Circle Drive was called the Main Outer Encircling Boulevard.  That and a lot more bridges.  There were plans for a Swastika Park which is kind of shocking until you realize that in 1913 and swastikas had an entirely different meaning and use.  We also had nine different bridges.  No word on how many of those were falling down.

In a somewhat unrelated note, this map was for sale in a comic book store in Saskatoon around 18 years ago for about $100.  I had always wished I had bought it then.  It is awfully cool.

Of course we saw some of the not-so-glamourous parts of City Hall like the dining room (meals are cheap there) and a lot of time in stairwells going back and forth.  No taxpayer money was wasted on elevators.

I have taken the Universal Studios backlot tour and now this one.  There were no giant gorilla’s attacking our bus on this tour but it was cool to see parts of City Hall that I had never seen before.  It was also nice to have the time to just wander through and look without having a meeting to be at.  Hopefully sometime in the future money will be available to post some of the cool stuff in there online.  There is some cool history in City Hall, not including the dated decor.

About Saskatoon City Hall

  • Saskatoon’s current City Hall is the fourth building to serve as the City’s civic administration office.
  • Council chambers is located in the north wing of City Hall.
  • This section of the building was designed by Scott, Bowers and Walls, and construction was completed in 1983.
  • The older south wing, which once served as the third City Hall building, was completed in 1956.
  • The first and second City Halls were located at the corner of 3rd Avenue and 21st Street, and in the old King Edward School (on what is now Civic Square) respectively.

Good for Saskatoon

I don’t know if you remember the scene from The Empire Strikes Back where Darth Vader sends out all of the imperial probe droids to find the secret Rebel base on Hoth (Han Solo and Chewbacca destroyed it) but I am thinking of getting one.

ProbeDroid TSWA

They would come in extremely useful in doing anything social downtown.  One of my favourite places in Saskatoon is the Rook & Raven.  Last summer you could go down at anytime and get a table.  Now you can’t get in if your life depended on it.  Of course there is always State & Main but from the day it started, you can’t get in.  Winston’s is as busy as it is loud and this is even after they opened the basement up.  I don’t even like the The Woods Ale House and it is always busy.  O’Shea’s Irish Pub often has room but it smells like deep fryer grease and we never want to go there.   There is a new pub going into where Scratch used to be and that could help a bit but the opening of The Woods Ale House and State & Main has only made it busier.

It’s good for Saskatoon to have a vibrant downtown at night and I can think of many big cities that would like to have a similar feel downtown but it’s awfully annoying when you try to go out with friends.  That is where these droids would come in useful.  They could scout ahead, save some seats, and if there is a deflector shield or ion cannon, I would know in advance.  It would also be a new revenue source for Saskatoon Cycles… droid valet.

Councilor Mairin Loewen

Councillor Mairin Loewen

Councillor Mairin Loewen is on the latest OurYXE Podcast.  She talks about Ward 7 alleyways, bridges (we love to talk about bridges), taxes, snow removal, and her NCAA bracket.  It was a good hour long discussion where she shared some really good insight on the future of the city.  Our ambush style of questioning did take a bit of a toll when she threatened me with failing bridges but if Bob Woodward can be threatened by Obama’s staff, I can take it from Loewen.  Of course I can no longer go to the east side of the city until we get the water taxi issue sorted out.

Cam Fuller sums up life in Saskatoon in one blog post

This is great and rather sad at the same time.

You have to feel for the citizens of Lastown. They’re hard-working. They mean well. But they’re always a step behind the times.

Take their current debate on food trucks. Every city in the world has food trucks. They’ve become a symbol of cool, sophisticated urban living. Civilization did not crumble in places that adopted food trucks. But Lastown officials are agonizing — agonizing — about allowing them in their fair city.

This gastronomic soul-searching should not be surprising. Even lowly hotdog carts were once forbidden in Lastown. They were regarded with suspicion — alien contraptions you could see only in movies set in New York City.

But times changed, eventually. People were travelling more and seeing how other people lived in more modern towns. They returned home and politely requested that hotdog carts be allowed in Lastown after all. To everyone’s surprise, city officials gave in.

Eating food outside, cooked by someone you didn’t know, was an incredible novelty — practically an illicit thrill — for Lastowners. They kind of liked the “big city” feeling, and lined up at the few hotdog carts they could find on a few street corners for a few weeks during the city’s short summer.

But in order to avoid culinary chaos breaking out downtown, city officials made sure that hot dogs and sausages were the only things available from the food carts. Fresh meat was banned in favour of safely salted and heavily nitrated tubes of delicious deboned meat byproducts. You never saw hamburgers on a Lastown food cart, no, no. In addition to being a tad fancy, hamburgers were almost certain to be a source of food-borne illness. Lastown’s city fathers made sure their children would never get sick from a sidewalk patty.

Twenty hotdog summers came. Wiener, ketchup, relish. Sausage, bun, mustard. Onion, peppers, pop. And 20 hotdog summers went. Wiener, ketchup, relish. Sausage, bun, mustard. Onion, peppers, pop. Lastown street eaters got used to the numbing routine of the limited menu.

Life went on. Lastowners lived their dry-ribs and deep-fried-spring-rolls lives. But one day, a downtown restaurant put tables and chairs on the sidewalk in front of its establishment. You should have heard the commotion.

“It’s like we’re Paris or something!” longtime Lastowners marvelled.

It’s funny how change triggers change. Lastown was starting to look so European that only a decade or two later, an entrepreneur got the idea to rent bicycles to tourists. He asked Lastown city hall for permission to set up in a park beside a hotel. The idea was frowned upon. What if other businesses demanded the same consideration, renting or selling things that customers wanted? Pretty soon the park would be full of people, you know, doing stuff. The bike rental idea was sent back for further study.
Wiener, ketchup, relish. Sausage, bun, mustard. Onion, peppers, pop.

Make sure you read the entire post.

Janice Braden on the OurYXE podcast

Janice Braden

Janice Braden joined us for the OurYXE podcast this week where we talked for a little over an hour about the Municipal Planning Commission, architecture, affordable housing, and city building.  It was a great discussion and I learned a lot from Janice.   Next weekend we are looking at chatting with Shaun Dyer, the executive director of the John Howard Society.  We will be talking about corrections, crime, and our community.

Why Affordable Housing in Core Neighborhoods is Needed (for now)

I sent a variation of this post to all City Councillors in response to the Planning and Operations Committee voting for a proposal that would limit affordable housing projects in core neighbourhoods.

As someone who has worked at starting affordable and emergency housing projects in the core neighbourhoods, I can’t help but think Planning and Operations is overlooking a variety of factors in making this decision.

Here are my concerns

In moving affordable housing out of the core neighbourhoods, costs are going to go way up for housing providers.  Already the grant money is often insufficient to pay for costs, even when I submit a barebones grant proposal.  In providing services like affordable housing, the costs can be the same but the revenue is way lower which means that your operating margins are really low.  I hope this isn’t news to you but there isn’t a lot of money in affordable housing to be made.  The rents organization like CUMFI and Quint charge are insanely low to match the really low amount of money that Social Sevices pays which is $459/month.  So as contractors and materials cost more, the rent remains at a pre-boom rate.  Sure we can charge more but then you are literally taking food off of someone’s table.  I hate to say it but it’s almost impossible to get a mortgage and pay it at those rates which is why our housing stock was so horrible before the boom.  According to CMHC, landlords struggle to maintain buildings at those rental rates.  That grants matter and they aren’t enough to build affordable housing elsewhere in the city.

To build elsewhere in the city, you are looking at higher costs, much higher costs.  The problem is that many organizations get their grant money from the federal government’s Homelessness Partnering Strategy or from agencies like Sask Housing.  Unless City Council can compel the Harper and Wall governments to expand HPS or Sask Housing programs, many of those project can not and will not be built in more expensive neighbourhoods.  The current round of funding from the federal government is only $1.9 million and that has numerous agencies competing for those grants.  There is not an abundance of dollars out there and the far outstrips supply.

Affordable Housing done right is costly.  Our clients can be really hard on a building.  Building hardware needs to be heavy duty and commercial grade and things tend to break down more depending on the population that you are working with.  While this gets better in time (as skills are taught), it’s more expensive to run some of these, 

The real issue in the core neighbourhoods (and all over the city) is poorly designed and conceptualized social projects. I have heard of service providers told to remove brickwork from a project, take out amenities, and other aspects of the building because it is “affordable” and “those people don’t deserve that”. The result is lower quality housing stock and buildings without green space or setbacks (which push people waiting for service onto sidewalks and streets).

The city needs to take an approach of raising the standards of many of these projects with the province and federal government so the impact of the building raises the standard of the neighbourhood.  Many cities are building better affordable housing units than Saskatoon is. Using better design and enforcing standards can help both the neighbourhood and those in need of affordable housing.  Good design can solve a lot of the problems in the neighbourhoods.

Of course access to services still matter. For a person on Social Services, they get $259/month for their basic allowance. Many take an advance of $240 paid back over 6 months which is $40 off of every check. Because many have to access emergency services, they are charged for them as an “over payment” which comes off another $15/month.

Too many people on Social Services are trying to buy food, clothes, phone and everything else for $200 which means that services like The Salvation Army, Saskatoon Food Bank, and the Friendship Inn are essential services to survive (and according to many statements by SS staff, are factored into when the province calculates their living allowance). By dispersing all of the affordable housing throughout the city, we are asking some to choose between food and housing. In many cities studies have shown that people have to walk up to 20 miles in a day to access services. When given that choice, studies and literature have shown that some will turn to crime and make really bad decisions.  I have written before of people telling me that it’s easy to “turn a trick” or “sell an 8-ball” when things get bad which not only are crimes but tend to make them homeless.  If the City of Saskatoon is going to disperse poverty, it needs to provide supports as well and they don’t exist.

Shirley Isbister’s comments to The StarPhoenix are right “…But Isbister says the whole philosophy of moving social services and housing out of the core is based on a false premise that affordable housing is the problem, not the solution to neighbourhood problems such as crime and drug abuse.”

There are some really good urban planning arguments for moving people throughout the city. James Howard Kunstler writes about them in the Geography of Nowhere but the problem is that our system right now is focused on services being delivered out of the core. By limiting affordable housing in the core and moving it outside, we risk creating more problems for the city and hurting a lot of people who need those services. There are some other ways to tackle the issues but until that is done at a provincial level, dispersing poverty throughout the city… in a city that isn’t equipped to provide those supports is going to hurt people and neighbourhoods in all wards.  The proposal from P&O will work in the future but it won’t work now.

I would encourage Saskatoon City Council to defeat this policy on Monday evening and start exploring new options to fix service delivery. This is a complicated issue and the proposed “solution” could very well make things a lot worse.

 

City considers spreading affordable housing

If the city goes through with this, it will be a tremendous mistake

The City of Saskatoon will likely curtail financial incentives for new affordable rental housing in core neighbourhoods in an effort to spread out social housing throughout the city.

A city committee voted in favour Tuesday of adopting rules that would make it more difficult for affordable housing units to be built in neighbourhoods such as Riversdale and Pleasant Hill, which are already home to much of the city’s affordable housing.

“We are never going to be able to rejuvenate these neighbourhoods unless we get at this at some point,” Coun. Pat Lorje told the city’s planning and operations committee.

The city provides up to 10 per cent of the upfront construction costs for people or organizations looking to build affordable units. If the new rules are endorsed by city council, new units would only receive that incentive if they are not built in core areas that already have a “concentration of affordable housing.”

Lorje has long been a proponent of moving social services and social housing away from the core neighbourhoods. She says neighbourhoods such as Pleasant Hill, Riversdale and Meadowgreen are bearing the burden of social agencies, affordable housing and, consequently, poverty.

But for many involved in affordable housing, the idea of “diluting” social housing is flawed.

“There has to be an understanding of people’s comfort level,” said Shirley Isbister, president of the Central Urban Metis Federation (CUMFI). “We know a lot of these people would not be going across town or downtown to get services. They won’t.”

CUMFI operates nine refurbished apartment buildings in the city’s core neighbourhood that act as shelters and affordable housing for at-risk women and children.

The committee was told operations such as CUMFI would likely be exempt from the new rules because they are able to demonstrate “positive impact on the neighbourhood.” But Isbister says the whole philosophy of moving social services and housing out of the core is based on a false premise that affordable housing is the problem, not the solution to neighbourhood problems such as crime and drug abuse.

Isbister was not at Tuesday’s meeting, but one city councillor echoed her sentiments. “I can’t understand the logic of this,” Coun. Charlie Clark said. “I can’t think of any of (affordable housing projects) that have contributed to the problems you are taking about.”

I am going to side with Shirley Isbister (and organizations like QUINT) on this one while disagreeing with Pat Lorje and the Planning and Operations Committee.  This is a terrible idea and a tragic misunderstanding of the impact of affordable housing.

In conversation with Charlie Clark

Summer

Sean, DeeAnn and I interview Councillor Charlie Clark for The OurYXE Podcast where talked for about an hour about a lot of things of importance that influence the city.

Charlie and I don’t always see to eye to eye but he is one of the most erudite councillors that this city has ever had.  He’s also the most open and transparent which means he is a great person to interview.  

Listening to the interview I am struck by how mayoral Charlie sounded.  He has a lot of big ideas and is looking at big picture solutions that encompass the entire city, not just his own ward.  Its an interview well worth listening to.  If you want to keep following the people and topics we are posting to OurYXE, you can find us on iTunes.