From the moment Donald Trump announced his presidential bid in June, he has used antipathy toward illegal immigrants as a mainstay of his campaign. Now his name is being invoked by basketball fans in Iowa who are trying to taunt a racially diverse high school team there.
Perry High is located in a rural part of the state, making its relatively high percentage of minorities unusual. According to a report by Iowa TV station WHO, fans at a game Monday were chanting “Trump! Trump! Trump!” and “U-S-A” at Perry players, who include boys of Latino, Native American and African American heritage.
“It’s honestly disrespectful. That’s how I take it. I hear it during the game, on and off the court. Everywhere I go,” Shammond Ivory, a senior on the team, told WHO.
An official for the school Perry played Monday, Dallas Center-Grimes, confirmed to the TV station that the chants had taken place. He declined to say whether any students had been disciplined.
“We are all aware of racism, it’s alive and well in small portions, but it’s alive and well and it’s just hurtful to see that’s what they resort to,” a Perry student, Kevin Lopez, said.
Disgusting actions by fans and by the school that allowed it to happen.
Here is the next edition of “Running for City Council”. Darren Hill and Ward 1 were featured here. Now I wander across 33rd Street into Ward 1 where we look at Pat Lorje, the long time councilor of the riding.
Pat Lorje is currently a city councilor for Ward 2 in Saskatoon,Saskatchewan. She previously held the same position from 1979 to 1991, when she resigned to stand as the New Democratic candidate in Saskatoon Wildwood in the 1991 provincial election. She was re-elected to the Ward in 2006, 2009, and 2012.
So yeah, she has some name recognition in the Ward and gets a lot of her support from the neighborhoods of Montgomery and Caswell Hill. It’s not that other neighborhoods don’t like her, it is just that none of the turn out in enough number to determine an election.
So what would my strategy be if I was running against a well known incumbent councilor? During the last election, a politician said that it didn’t matter what their opponent did, they just had to worry about getting to a certain number of votes and there was a number of ways to get to that vote total. The same thing would apply in Ward 2 and the secret is to cobbling together a coalition of voters who are frustrated with city life in Ward 2 and getting them out to vote. This is how I would do it.
The NDP haven’t faced a serious re-election battle in Riversdale since Jo-Ann Zazelenchuk beat Roy Romanow in 1982. They generally won handily in the area but that has started to change. I have written before about the declining margins of victory that Danielle Chartier has won by in Saskatoon Riversdale which has gotten to the point where she is vulnerable to being beaten by the right Saskatchewan Party candidate (Not sure Marv Friesen is that candidate but you never know). My point is that it looks like parts of that ward are voting right wing more often. No longer is Montgomery home to veterans, it is home to an eclectic group of people who haven’t been voting for Lorje since before I was born.
Despite Montgomery being her base, it’s been a tough time for the neighborhood. Despite several passionate speeches to City Council, Lorje wasn’t able to stop the wind turbine (which was a good idea until it came back economically unfeasible) and the construction of hundreds of new units of apartments. The new City Operations Centre is going south of Montgomery. The South Circle Drive Bridge and Circle Drive bring 24 hour traffic noise by Montgomery. For a community that thinks of itself as a first among equals, much has changed a lot and people aren’t happy about it. In the end, the wind turbine might have been the best of all things that could have happened.
Convincing those voters to either vote for you or stay at home on election day.
The Montgomery Apartments
Even if the older part of Montgomery holds, there are a lot of new voters to the community in those apartments. They aren’t long term supporters of Lorje and are open to anyone who is going to go after them. A flyer drop to those apartments reinforcing some of Lorje’s and Montgomery’s residents statements about those apartments could make it really awkward for her.
The same thing with the Riversdale BID. Lorje has been a large proponent of the business aspect part of it but against social programs being located there. In a community that has seen it’s share of gentrification, a campaign reminding voters that Lorje has been against the services that are needed to help them could bring out voters in Riversdale. Lorje and I have disagreed for years on these kinds of policies but that doesn’t matter. If the voter is against gentrification, the answer is that it has happened because of the focus on business development on 20th Street with the kind of growth that has locked out local people. If they are frustrated with the ongoing issues with crime and social issues, it is because there is no room for the social agencies to help them. The question always is will Riversdale and Pleasant Hill turn out in enough numbers to vote? History says no.
Crime is rising in the city (thank goodness the City of Saskatoon Police were there to save us from the Compassion Club) and it is increasingly violent and more serious in Ward 2 where it is heavily concentrated. This is one of those issues that is almost impossible to blame on Lorje, the issues are beyond the control of any one councilor but because of the incredible density of it in Ward 2 residents feel it. To be honest, this isn’t a big issue to attack the incumbent with and it won’t be that hard to beat back but it could be problematic if people are frustrated in Meadow Green, Caswell Hill, Riversdale, and Pleasant Hill and are asked, “Do you feel safer than you were in 2012?” For most, the answer is no.
Is Lorje prone to be swept away if a sea of change finally hits City Hall? Actually no. That is the advantage of being an outspoken councilor, she has her own brand of politics that is separate from the rest of City Councils. If a mood to change sweeps across the mighty South Saskatchewan River, Lorje is in a good place to ride it out.
It all comes down to whether or not someone can figure out the issues to motivate your coalition of voters to turn out on election day. I think it could happen but it would be a long and drawn out campaign combined with a mayoral campaign that can bring out non typical voters. If that happens, it could be the race to watch on election night.
A couple of years ago Sean Shaw and I talked about doing a podcast about how to defeat each of the 10 city councilors. That would only be fun if it was an election year so here we are but Shaw is in Victoria tormenting a new city. So instead of a podcast, I am doing a series of posts on how I would run a campaign against each other the councilors that are running in the next municipal election.
Darren Hill is the three term incumbent running in Ward 1. He defeated incumbent Donna Birkmaier (2006), Carol Reynolds (2009) and Robin Bellamey (2012). So far he is uncontested but with Jeb Bush having some extra time on his hands… There is still a lot of time between now and and the next municipal election.
What I Would Do If I Was Running Against Him: To channel my inner Karl Rove, I’d go after his strengths which in part is the role Hill plays in representing Saskatoon on the FCM and SUMA and point out that Hill is more likely to be chatting up Neil Patrick Harris on Twitter than attending to the real and serious issues of Ward 1. I’d point out that Hill abandoned the western half of Ward 1 when he ran under the Michael Ignatieff led Liberals and he’s priming the pump for another run in the future. Something along the lines of, “He’s not in it for you.”
Would it work? Probably not because the perfect time and person to do it was last election when Robin Bellamy ran. Hill had just been clobbered in the federal race and you could have made a compelling case that said, “City Council is not a plan B”. Instead Bellamy ran on Cosmo and a quiet support of the Mayor (who isn’t popular in Ward 1) and lost handily to Hill.
This time around Hill’s biggest weakness is how poorly he has spent his communications fund. No newsletters that I have seen, erratic email communication to the Ward, and a much lower visibility this time around. While he continues to do excellent constituency work, his biggest vulnerability might be, “we only see you around at election time.”
Is that a winning message. Probably not. Those that care about municipal politics are probably the kinds of voters that dialogue with Hill and therefore get a response. In talking to neighbors, they seem to appreciate the work that Hill has done for them when called upon, even if they haven’t always appreciated all of the city decisions. That is generally the winning formula for city councilors running for re-election.
Where it does start to become a problem for him is an outside candidate runs for Mayor and channels the frustration with the city quo on a bunch of areas and hill as an incumbent gets caught up on that. All incumbents are vulnerable on rising crime in Saskatoon, transparency and competence of City Hall, and a desire for change as the economic conditions in the city have changed. Local campaigns don’t have the money to pound home those issues but riding the coat tails of a mayoral campaign that turns to the theme of change, could make Ward 1 interesting. Even in an interesting campaign, I can’t see Hill going down in defeat.
The mistake that people make in municipal elections is that because they see the world in a left/right spectrum, the rest of the world does. We don’t. We care about things like roads being cleaned, potholes being fixed, and safe communities, that is where Hill does a good job.
Chances of Being Defeated: Low. Expect to see him as your Ward 1 councilor for the next four years but if you disagree with me, feel free to run or leave your thoughts in the comments below.
Disclosure: I endorsed Hill in the last two elections. Documents obtained in a FOI of City Councilors named me as a Darren Hill crony and it was suggested that I was a part of a Darren Hill slate. I am still bitter about that. More than it suggests that I am any civic politician’s crony and if there was a slate of candidates, it would be the Jordon Cooper slate.
Has anyone ever asked if the National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy is the right one or do the votes outweigh any kind of dialogue at all?
For those of you may have forgotten what it is.
The National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy is a Government of Canada program operated by the Department of Public Works and Government Services. The National Shipbuilding Procurement Strategy (NSPS) was developed by the Conservative Stephen Harper government in an effort to renew the fleets of the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) and the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG). The strategy was broken into three sections; the combat package, the non-combat package and the smaller vessel package. The smaller vessel package was not able to bid on by those companies who won one of larger ship packages
$30 billion for 21 combatant (warships) vessels to serve in the RCN
- 5-6 vessels from the Arctic Patrol Ship Project
- up to 15 vessels from the Single Class Surface Combatant Project: It is known that the Canadian Forces are seeking to build a single new class of frigates or destroyers to replace both the Iroquois-class destroyers and Halifax-class frigates under what the Royal Canadian Navy has called the Single Class Surface Combatant Project (SCSCP).
$8 billion for 8 non-combatant vessels to serve in the CCG and RCN
- 2 vessels from the Joint Support Ship Project (for the RCN)
- 1 vessel, CCGS John G. Diefenbaker (for the CCG)
- 1 vessel from the Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel Project (for the CCG to replace CCGS Hudson)
- 3 vessels from the Offshore Fisheries Science Vessels Project (for the CCG to replace CCGS Alfred Needler, CCGS Teleost, CCGS W. E. Ricker, and CCGS Wilfred Templeman.)
On 20 January 2015, it was announced that Irving Shipbuilding had been named the prime contractor for the program. The total cost of the program including the single class surface warships is $26 billion CAD. The role of the lead contractor gives Irving Shipbuilding overall control of the project, and the company had already won the right to build the vessels at its yard in Halifax. This led to questions concerning the bidding process and the awarding of the contracts. In the fall of 2015, it was reported that there were high increases in costs, more than doubling to $30 billion from $14 billion for the new warships. The total cost of the naval ship building program rose from $26.2 billion to $42 in this new study. This put in jeopardy the number of ships that could be produced and raised the prospect of ships with reduced capabilities.
Here are some thoughts
- The other goal was to rebuild ship building in Canada. At the time of the competition, Irving Shipbuilding didn’t have a lot in terms of new orders, Davie Shipbuilding is a shell company that bought the assets of a shipbuilding yard in Quebec just so it could get a piece of the action. When it didn’t win, it was sold to a Monaco based company. Seaspan Marine, a division of a larger ship servicing company has no large orders on it’s list. The Canadian ship building industry is more or less non existent. It’s going to take a lot of money just to bring it up to capacity.
- Capacity is a huge thing in ship building. Recruiting and training the tradespeople to build ships and then keeping them employed (with new orders) is a big thing. Like all people, they get better at their jobs the more they do them which is why U.S. Naval vessels tend to become cheaper and better quality the more ships that are made. If you read about the Littoral Combat Ships, the US Navy has this problem as well.
- If you aren’t constantly building ships, you lose capacity for shipbuilding and even repair. This is why we can’t keep our subs underwater very long. We went decades without building any or even really repairing them. It’s a mess every time we have to fix one of them because that capacity has retired or left the country. This will happen unless we commit to building enough ships to keep both the Seaspan and Irvine shipyards busy.
- The jobs aspect is the weirdest part of this. Yes jobs are important and you don’t want to export jobs to other shipyards because the political cost would be insane but if the goal is to get the best ship for your money, then it does make sense to order from a U.S. shipyard that has experience in building warships. As a matter of fact, why not just order a U.S. warship that is already designed, worked the bugs out, and is proven? That is the cheapest way.
- Of course that will never happen because those jobs matter and supporting Canadian industry is a big part of this. Having two functioning shipyards is important if God forbid, we do find ourselves in a conflict in Russia or China. A base on each coast could become vital if one is disabled and it is the exact reason why the U.S. builds it’s warships in multiple shipyards. That being said, let’s accept that these are long term subsidies for both shipyards and it is going to cost more to build Canadian than elsewhere. Not only that but we are going to have to keep building here for a long time to keep those jobs and expertise working and so it doesn’t leave at the first extended lull and layoffs in our yards.
- We won’t have to nationalize those yards but accept that they will need Government of Canada support in terms of business to keep open. This isn’t a short term project but a long term process to keep them open.
Well that was fun. My column this morning on the Mayor missing the first day of the Big City Mayor’s Conference got a lot of feedback. When I say feedback, what I am really saying is that most people hope I move out of the city soon.
One friend asked me that if I was Atch’s chief of staff, what would I do to make him a better mayor in 2016. I really don’t have a problem with Atch personally and I think some things can’t change but here would be my list for what I think any mayor should do.
- Represent us on the national stage well. That means showing up for things like the Big City Mayor’s Caucus when the federal government changes.
- Engage the population well. Nenshi, Tory, Ivison, and a lot of other mayors use Twitter to not only communicate but listen to citizens. He needs a website. My preference would be that we did mayor.saskatoon.ca but even mayorofsaskatoon.ca would work as his platform for which to inform the public. A couple of years ago I visited Michael Bloomberg’s mayoral website. I was blown away but the design and the content. I could find essential services information, New York City research, and all of his initiatives. Really, how much does that cost? It’s all being prepared anyways, so why not make it available to the citizens. Using social media, you can not only talk to people but listen and make them feel heard and connection to their mayor. Some do it better than others but there are people who have ideas, problems, and issues with the city. Give them a voice and help them be heard.
- Be transparent: That debate over Atch posting his schedule online (which he did exactly once) was insane. All he has to do is post the special interests he meets with. Nenshi does this on this website. It lists community groups, consular visitors, business leaders, and the occasional celebrity. It doesn’t give away secret negotiations (which the Mayor doesn’t often do, city managers do) or even his lunch plans. It does let Calgarians know what their mayor is up to and what people are shaping his decisions. Why can’t Saskatoon’s mayor do the same thing? Why can’t the Mayor of Saskatoon have the same disclosure as councilors do over travel and other expenses?
- Acknowledge all of the data that is out there instead of going, “Saskatoon is different”. This isn’t just about complete streets, density, homelessness, suburban sprawl, bike lanes, or policing. It is all of them. Other cities have fought our battles, been confronted by our problems (and found solutions) and many have researched the results. Yet that kind of thinking if rarely shown in Saskatoon. It is the kind of thinking that should come from a Mayor’s chair. They are the one that is there full time, has a staff, and sets the tone. Can you imagine a data driven City Hall adopting best practices from across the continent? No I can’t either. Is it too late to recruit Michael Bloomberg into Saskatoon?
- Be able to articulate where you want the city to go and become. I am not just saying “1 million people” but do you want it to be a car driven city that is all about freeways or a city based around public transit and alternative forms of transportation? You can’t be for everything, have a vision and drive it. Let the people decide what they want, if it isn’t that vision, well that is the cost of leadership.
- Be financially responsible but understand the need for good investments that will save the city money down the line.
- Hire the best managers in the country. Get managers who will push council as much as they will be directed by them. Calgary’s manager calling for investment in the city was great. Jen Keesmat calling out John Tory’s plan for the Gardiner Expressway is how cities are supposed to work. Strong leaders bring conflict but they also bring out great ideas because they are all working on making Saskatoon a world class city. I loved to see Mike Gutek battle with City Council, not because I liked to watch the fireworks but because I honestly felt that we were making progress as a city during those questions and answers. Hard questions were asked and hard answers were given back. That is often where progress is made. On the flip side, the transit debacle showed that competence is hard to come by in our own City Council and administration when they locked out the ATU once illegally and then tried to do it again. If you are going to lock out the transit drivers and make your own citizens going through hardships, at least do it correctly. Maybe it is time to look outside the city for top talent.
- Speak bluntly about the city’s issues. I miss Ralph Klein but we all know what Calgary was going through when I lived there. The same thing with Nenshi today. We are going to face some challenges ahead and some of them are because of the federal and provincial governments. Others are going to be from the business and non-profit communities. Call a spade a spade. The Mayor doesn’t need to be everyone’s best friend, they need to be the leader of the city with our interests at heart.
- Go the galas but attend the community barbecues as well. There are a lot of people in this city that will never be able to afford a Mayor’s Cultural Gala or Swinging with the Stars but things like a community barbecue mean a lot to them. Be at the events on both sides of the river and for all economic classes. There is more to the westside then the Farmer’s Market.
I don’t know if anyone running has those traits but the more they do, the better off the city will be.
Good ad by the Saskatchewan Party although it doesn’t do well on the whole accuracy meter.
Young people are still leaving Saskatchewan but it is immigration that is keeping the provinces population up. Also, the government in power during the time that Wall is speaking of, was not a NDP government, it was the Grant Devine administration in which Brad Wall worked for as a staffer and later chief of staff. As far as people leaving the province during that time, the population in Saskatchewan actually grew by 40,000 people.
Political ads never let the facts get in the way of a good ad.
On July long weekend I was incredibly sick with infection in my leg. I was overwhelmed with fever, cold sweats and dehydration. Wendy took me to St. Paul’s Emergency Waiting Room where I was admitted to the quieter ward. Eventually it all filled up. Everyone of us had the same story. We were all on wait lists to see a specialist but our health had deteriorated to the point where we had to be treated or admitted on an emergency basis. Several of us have waited months.
John Maeda once wrote that more administration need to understand what their users are going through. It’s why while teaching at MIT, he also enrolled at MIT to understand what his students were going through. For me, I have struggled to keep treatments going despite them being ordered by the surgeon for no other reason then the nurses are often intimidated by the bureacracy and refuse to act without new doctors orders. This means new appointments and a frustrated doctor who already left orders.
I wouldn’t wish this infection on anyone but until you go through it, it’s hard to truly realize how brutal our system is and I’ll be honest, lean hasn’t made it any better.
Not only are we suffering (the treatment given at the hospital that day actually made my infection worse) but we are costing the system how much more in emergency room costs and hospital admissions?
I’ve watched this about 10 times now. Could you imagine a Cam Broten or Brad Wall theme song like this for upcoming election? Or even a Don Atchison one in a civic campaign?
“The moment a leader allows himself to become the primary reality people worry about, rather than reality being the primary reality, you have a recipe for mediocrity, or worse.”
The Political Panel’s Murray Mandryk and Stefani Langenegger discuss the controversy over the province’s $1.4B carbon dioxide capture project with Morning Edition host Sheila Coles. You need to watch it.
This reminds me a lot of some of the Devine mega projects that never worked as promised which this Saskatchewan Party seems to still be in love with. This is the first one they made happen and it’s really not working nearly as well as they promised. As Murray Mandryk said, maybe Wall should not has been as smug as he has been.
Also as Mandryk says, maybe you can’t effectively capture coal in western Canada. As Langenegger points out, SaskPower rate payers are actually subsidizing Alberta oil companies to get oil out of the ground. This project is a big mess.
If you want to read more, check out James Fallows in The Atlantic on clean coal from 2010.
Since the editor of the site is the same as the publisher, I am given tremendous latitude in who I endorse around here.
In Saskatoon West where I live, I have a choice between:
- Randy Donauer: Conservative
- Lisa Abbott: Liberal
- Sheri Benson: NDP
Of the three, the NDP were the only ones that knocked on my door. A gaggle of Conservatives walked by my door, looked at the address, checked their database and kept walking. Apparently they were not interested in either Wendy or my vote in this election. I wasn’t even robo-called called by the Conservatives or the Liberals. So yeah, thanks for the effort teams.
For me the decision comes down to the Liberals and the NDP, both parties are outside of my federal comfort levels. I have serious problems with both of their platforms but nothing compared to the problems I had with the Conservative campaign.
I also have been poorly served by Kelly Block’s office. When I used to contact Carol Skelton’s office, I always got a personal follow up from Skelton, even when she was a minister. The one time I contacted Kelly Block’s about a serious issue, I was sent Conservative Party talking points by an assistant.
I have watched Randy Donauer as a city councillor and I was greatly disappointed in the change I saw from the time he announced his candidacy until now. He was always a fiscal conservative which is needed but to see him pander that almost exclusively in council meetings was frustrating. From the time that he announced his candidacy, I called on him to resign his seat on council (just as I did when Councillors Paulsen and Hill did when the ran for the Liberals) which is the same as other some other cities require.
As for the Conservative record.
- Bill C-51 when the United States has proven that local police will abuse powers.
- Elimination of the Mandatory Long Form Census
- Botched military procurement (which to be honest, isn’t all their fault)
- Seeing military procurement as a job builder rather than equipping the Canadian Forces with the best gear possible.
- The Mike Duffy debacle
- The Pamela Wallin debacle
- The decision to shut down the senate without making a serious effort at reforming it.
- Lack of participation with the Premiers
- Cutting funding to the Homelessness Partnering Program
- The feud with the Supreme Court of Canada
- The lack of desire to fix unsafe water conditions on Canadian reserves.
- Muzzling of scientists then lying about it.
I grew up in a Conservative household. I was part of PC Youth. I still defend Grant Divine when push comes to shove but I can’t defend this record. Part of me thinks that if another Conservative government had acted like this, Stephen Harper would start his own party… oh right, that is exactly what he did do.
I thought Lisa Abbott has run a great campaign. So great that it may cause an unfavourable vote split between the Liberals and the NDP but that it the first past the post system. She has run the best Liberal campaign I have ever seen in Saskatoon West since I moved here in 1984. Her candidacy (and the Justin Trudeau campaign) have made Liberals relevant in Saskatoon West for the first time ever. I can’t speak highly enough of how she carries herself in this campaign.
As for Sheri Benson, she has been working on issues that political parties ignored during this campaign. Poverty and homelessness for years through the Saskatoon United Way. She has brought different social agencies together (it’s like herding cats but harder) and brought focus to issues that few care about. If Lisa Abbott has been helped by the Trudeau campaign, Benson has probably been hurt by the mediocre NDP campaign (the phrase “You NDP’d that up” for when you should win but don’t is now entering our lexicon).
If I lived in Saskatoon Grasswords, I would vote for Tracy Muggli and in Saskatoon University I’d vote for Cynthia Block. Both are excellent candidates that deserve to be in Ottawa.
Living in Saskatoon West, I am going to endorse Sheri Benson. She has shown the ability to move local issues that few cared about forward and that is what we will need in Ottawa. In a minority government, all parties will need people who can bring people together. Sheri will do that for the NDP.
That being said, I have a tremendous amount of respect for Lisa Abbott for her campaign. She would also make a great MP from what I have seen and if either one of them are unsuccessful, I hope they run again either provincially or federally.
I was asked a few times today if I was going to run for Mayor in 2016. The answer is no. I have no political aspirations and have no desire to be a politician. That and I don’t like ties or suits. Even if I did, big boned and balding politicians generally don’t do that well… wait a minute, we do really well in politics.
I have very little respect for career politicians. There are many people I know (and we all have our lists) that desperately want to be elected to something and want to remain elected for financial, prestige, or even retirement reasons (I have heard of politicians whose entire retirement planning is based on getting elected and then government pension). They see politics as a career and as a path to greater political power. I don’t aspire to that. I have control of the both the TV remote and the Apple TV remote at home. I’m good.
I have a lot of respect for those that are public servants. Those are people who are drawn to the service of their city, province, and country and that is the main motivating factor for them. The problem is that most politicians start out that way but it’s a fine line until you transform into a politician where re-election comes before doing what is right. Some public servants can be elected for decades and serve only the public. I think of the Joe Clark’s, John Crosbie’s, or the countless MP, MLAs, and councillors that care far more about constituent issues and the big picture than party politics or personal gain. They avoid the meanness that defines many politicians and they genuinely love their jobs. I think they are great but I still wouldn’t want to be one. I simply lack the desire to compromise on things and in our system, it is based on compromise and doing things you hate.
Then you also have the campaign fight. That can’t be a lot of fun. I remember door knocking a couple of decades ago and a guy came to the door with a shot gun, I was bit by a stray dog, and some naked women answered her door. No wonder Atch stands on the streets and waves at cars. Who can blame him? If I was him I’d have a small portable fence with me at all times. If someone from the media questioned me, I’d have them stand outside the fence and deal with the dogs.
I was out with some candidates and councillors years ago and they were talking about lawn sign stake storage and what a pain that is. So let me get this straight, you win office and instead of celebrating, you have to clean out your shed and build extra storage for the stuff you need for the next campaign. Wendy would not be pleased with that. We have a small house, we don’t have a lot of storage. She’d be out campaigning for Atch or Charlie Clark on the provision that they took all of the lawn sign stakes when I lost.
I’d be going, “How does the other campaigns get all of these leaks from?” and Wendy and Mark would be avoiding making eye contact with me as they easily moved stuff in and out of our shed. Okay, that would be hilarious but still.
Also, the being recognized in public part is both good and bad. Bad when someone tells me how stupid I am in front of my kids. Good when they say nice things to me but I still find myself going, “please don’t punch me in the face” when someone goes, “Aren’t you Jordon Cooper?”. Of course I could just be like one councillor who makes me go, “I thought they quit council” the rare time they speak.
I guess I could run against Darren Hill but here is a list of his accomplishments in office and my position on them.
Darren Hill’s Record in Office
Jordon Cooper’s Position
Avenue B Diverter in Mayfair
Thought it was a good idea
Thought the Cosmo deal was a costly mistake
Disagrees with 33rd Street Bridge and says it would be built over his dead body.
We agree with that too although I hope no one has to die to stop it.
Wears colourful socks
Wears plain socks
Wears colourful ties
Has a tie just like Rob Ford’s NFL tie but has NHL logos on it. Wishes he had a tie like Rob Ford’s NFL tie. Would also wear a MLB tie. Now that I think about it, that is a solid three tie rotation.
Suggested that we wait a few years to buy a new city website when prices were lower.
Tweets at celebrities
Does that actually work? (update: Darren says it does.)
Tweets at City Council Meetings
Tweets about confidential in-camera meetings that he read about in The StarPhoenix.
Ran for the federal Liberal Party after two terms as councillor.
Criticized Hill, Paulsen, Olauson, and Donauer for doing the same thing and not resigning their seat.
Non committal about in Council Twitter Wall.
Totally in favour of Twitter wall. Really, really in favour of a Twitter wall. Have I mentioned how badly I want City Council to have a live twitter wall.
That would be a riveting debate. I can see the moderator saying, “So the only area where you truly disagree is men’s socks. Well let’s go back to that issue once more and Mr. Cooper, could you tell us where you got that NFL logo tie from?”
So after reading that chart over, I am not running in Ward 1 or anywhere else in the city since I live in Ward 1. Darren is doing a fine job… well there was the vote where he voted to “right size the bridge” that was waste of tens of millions of dollars. Nor do I ever aspire to being on Saskatoon City Council not now and not in the future. Here is why.
Outside of Wendy and the boys, not many people have seen how sick I have been this summer. It has scared Wendy and even made me wonder from time to time if I was going to make it. I have never been so sick in my life and it hasn’t been fun. Today my vital signs were so out of whack, the nurses freaked out and that happens all of the time. There is no way I am strong enough to make it through a campaign even if I did want to. I have never seriously considered it but I need get rid of the MRSA infection in my ankle and then get healthy again.
I have been married with 18 years this week to Wendy and for the first time since we have been married, her depression and mental health issues are under control. You have no idea how many times I have said, “next summer” will be better (well actually about 16 summers). To actually have a summer trip go well and her depression be managed was a huge thing in life but we have a lot of catching up to do.
Those lost summers have come with a price of me being there for Wendy and not having the time to spend with Mark and Oliver. It’s why next summer is being spent in the backcountry of Banff and Kootney National Parks. The only door knocking I plan to do is at the door of a mountain tea house at the end of a long hike (I hope I don’t get bit by anything)
I don’t know how politicians handle their commitments to the public and family. Is there a less family friendly job then being a politician at any level? For this I am not being sarcastic, I can’t imagine how hard it is to juggle all of that well. I enjoy being a dad.
So my plans are set for election night 2016, vote and watch Monday Night Football while writing about those that did decide to run. That is my goal for 2020, 2024, and 2028. It is also my goal for any and all provincial and federal campaigns. I have even a less of a desire to be told how to vote by a government or opposition whip who got the job because they are difficult to deal with in Question Period.
So yeah, I am never running for public office but thanks for suggesting it. Throw your support behind someone that wants the job, there are some good ones out there, support them.
I guess because I have always assumed that Mulcair would not win this election and that the Orange Wave was a one off election result, that he would hold on. Then again, I am not a partisan New Democrat and kind of missed this.
If — as the polls are suggesting — he leads the NDP back to third place, Mulcair is unlikely to get another kick at the election can.
The New Democrats have a long and unbroken record of federal defeats and almost as long a history of giving their leaders a second or even a third chance. But a defeat this time would feel different to many party loyalists for they were asked to put quite a bit of water in their ideological wine on the way to their latest bid for government.
To make matters worse, if the NDP ends up back in third place, it will not be because it stood against the Conservative anti-terrorism act or opposed Canada’s military role in its mission against Islamic extremists in the Middle East, or even because it stood against a niqab ban.
From the New Democrat perspective, those would all be good hills to die on.
What has really ailed the Mulcair campaign has been an excess of prudence and a failure to cast the party as a compelling, convincing agent of change. On that score, the Liberals did not steal the ground from under the feet of the New Democrats. The latter left it vacant for Trudeau to occupy.
Whether Mulcair himself would want to stay on for very long if he is defeated in the election is an open question.
Over the campaign, the NDP leader has sometimes been hard-pressed to conceal his contempt for the skills of his Liberal rival. It is hardly a given that he would want to play second fiddle to Trudeau in opposition to another Conservative government or that he could be a happy camper propping up a minority Liberal government.
Also, if you are Harper or Mulcair, columns like these are the worst thing you want to read anytime but especially this close to the election.
Trudel needed 24 paragraphs to dismiss that request. Nearer the end was a sentence that could be used to summarize the whole affair. “I find,” she wrote, “that the appellant has not demonstrated that refusing his application for stay would result in irreparable harm to the public interest.”
Here is some of the background of the decision from Maclean’s Magazine
That finding is based, in part, on the government’s own convoluted defence of its actions. What might otherwise be considered a ban on the wearing of the niqab during the citizenship oath has been presented to the court as an expression of “a desire in the strongest possible language.” So the ban is not quite a ban, insofar as citizenship judges have the discretion to allow someone to wear a niqab during the oath; despite the policy’s use of the term “must,” the government has been arguing that there is some room for a judge to decide that a woman need not remove her niqab.
The trouble here is that the minister, Jason Kenney, in this situation, does not have the power to unilaterally fetter the discretion of citizenship judges. Thus, if the ban were said to be mandatory, the government’s case would be moot.
The Federal Court’s Justice Keith Boswell found that the policy was mandatory in nature—and also in contradiction with legislation that allows for the greatest possible religious freedom in swearing the oath—and the Federal Court of Appeal found no reason to differ with Justice Boswell on that point. But the argument that the policy is optional has now been used by Trudel to dismiss the government’s request for a stay.
“Presuming that the appellant is right that the policy at issue is not mandatory and citizenship judges can apply it or not . . . how can one raise a claim of irreparable harm?” Trudel writes—irreparable harm being the standard for a stay. “It is simply inconsistent to claim, on the one hand, that a policy has no binding effect on decision-makers, but that irreparable harm would result if that policy was to be declared unlawful on the other.”
Furthermore, Trudel notes, “Citizenship and Immigration Canada had valid guidelines and procedures to ensure that citizenship candidates take the oath prior to the adoption of the policy. These guidelines and procedures are undisturbed by the finding that the policy is unlawful. There is no legislative or regulatory void.”
That is, procedures already exist to ensure an oath is duly sworn.