Another report has come out in support of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), an innovative way to provide public transit at a low cost with dedicated bus lanes, stops, and schedules.
The study (PDF), from pro-transit group Embarq, found that BRT drastically reduced commute times, improved air quality, and cut road fatalities in congested cities like Bogota, Istanbul, Johannesburg, and Mexico City. And we already know that BRT is one of the most cost-effective public transit investments a municipality can make.
The catch? In most cities examined in the report, those benefits only extend to low- and middle-class residents. (In Johannesburg, the poorest residents did not use BRT).
â€œSince the dominant benefit is travel time savings,â€ the studyâ€™s authors wrote, â€œthe majority of benefits tend to accrue to the strata most represented by BRT users â€” typically lower- and middle-income.â€
While itâ€™s great to have a system that improves transportation access for the majority of a cityâ€™s population, BRTâ€™s mass appeal could â€” ironically â€” be a political concern that prevents its adoption, at least in the U.S. As Alex Pareene wrote in Salon, public transit often suffers because politicians and donors rarely rely on it. The results show in the states, whose existing BRT systems lag behind those in cities around the world.
Even in densely populated and traditionally liberal cities like New York and Minneapolis, politicians neglect transit. And â€œbecause they donâ€™t know or interact with or receive checks from people who rely on it every day, thereâ€™s almost no hope for cheap, efficient mass transit options anywhere,â€ Pareene wrote.
Indeed, the Embarq report echoes the public transit wealth gap, and cites that most BRT systems are often paid for by tax revenue collected from those who may never ride it. Bogotaâ€™s famed TransMilenio was financed by increased gasoline taxes, and all the systems required both substantial investment and support from municipalities.
But the Embarq report also showed that BRTs benefited cities with environmental and productivity gains more than they strained financial resources. For example, the average commuter in Istanbul now gets to and from work about an hour faster thanks to the MetrobÃ¼s, and Mexico Cityâ€™s BRT system reduced air pollution enough to save 6,000 sick days a year.
As cities continue to grow and congestion increases, the benefits of BRT may become impossible to ignore â€” even to the rich and powerful folks who are stuck in traffic.
You see the same thing here in Saskatoon. Â After last nightâ€™s City Council meeting, you could almost say the same things about bike lanes.