For months, dozens of HarperCollins staff â€” sales, marketing, publicity, and legal â€” have managed to keep a potentially explosive new book almost entirely quiet. The Most Dangerous Animal of All, by Gary L. Stewart, is being published tomorrow but still has no cover art on the publisher’s website. It hasn’t gotten any press. As of 1:30 p.m. today, its Amazon sales rank was #140,113.
The book’s official plot summary is intriguing, but lacks specifics:
An explosive and historic book of true crime and an emotionally powerful and revelatory memoir of a man whose ten-year search for his biological father leads to a chilling discovery: His father is one of the most notorious-and still at large-serial killers in America.
Not mentioned in the summary: Stewart, a vice-president at a cleaning company in Baton Rouge, alleges that his father was the Zodiac Killer, who is believed to have killed at least five people in Northern California, and famously sent letters and cryptograms to Bay Area newspapers. The murders were never solved.
Stewart reached the conclusion that his father was the serial killer after twelve years of research, Tina Andreadis, a publicist at HarperCollins, told me today.
Approximately fifteen months ago, B.G. Dilworth Agency brought a proposal for the book to HarperCollinsâ€™s Michael Signorelli (an editor who has since left for Henry Holt). It was acquired within a week or two, for an amount HarperCollins declined to disclose. â€œIt was a standard acquisition process,â€ another publicist told me, â€œexcept for the NDA.â€ Stewart was paired with writer Susan Mustafa, a veteran of the true crime genre.
The book â€” 367 pages, including the index â€” was vetted by HarperCollins lawyers, including Fabio Bertoni, who is now general counsel at The New Yorker. â€œOur lawyers felt it was legally sound,â€ said Andreadis.
I asked if HarperCollins had reached out to the San Francisco Police Department, which investigated the cases. Andreadis said they had not. According to the book, she said, the department â€œknew more than theyâ€™re willing to admit.â€