It wasnâ€™t a billion. It was $1.8-billion — $1.825-billion to be more precise.
Rankin was let go on July 28 from the Zellers at Dufferin and Dupont in Toronto after 13 years working the cash, the sales floor and as a pharmacy technician, with nothing more than the legally mandated severance pay her employers were required to give.
â€œItâ€™s selfishness. Itâ€™s sad,â€ says Rankin, 50, a mother of one who helps support cousins in Jamaica.
â€œI donâ€™t know what theyâ€™re thinking. I donâ€™t know where their mind is. Itâ€™s greediness.â€
Rankin will speak at a demonstration led by the United Food and Commercial Workers Union on Wednesday, Aug. 22, at 11 a.m., in front of Targetâ€™s Canadian headquarters in Mississauga.
â€œTarget needs to do the right thing â€“ keep the workers and respect their wages and benefits,â€ says Kevin Shimmin, national representative of the UFCW Canada,
Target posted earnings Wednesday of $704 million (U.S.), or $1.06 per share, in the period ended July 30. Overall revenue rose 3.5 per cent to $16.45 million in the quarter. Revenue at stores opened at least a year rose 3.1 per cent.
The chain will open its first stores in Canada in 2013.
First of all, Target paid HBC $1.85 billion dollars for leases, not the business. HBC is the one that kept the $1.85 billion. It could have given bonuses to all of itâ€™s former employees but it didnâ€™t. It was used to bolster itâ€™s bottom line and no one seems upset at them. Secondly, Target has no legal or moral imperative to keep the salary structure, benefits or jobs of the people for the property it bought.
â€œIt doesnâ€™t have to be this way,â€ says Kendra Coulter, a professor at the Centre for Labour Studies at Brock University. â€œThis is a decision that has been made at the corporate level by Target and Zellers and HBC.â€
She blames Stephen Harperâ€™s Conservative government for failing to protect workers.
â€œIf a very profitable foreign company is going to come into our country to rebrand stores, our citizens deserve respect and some criteria have to be met. Theyâ€™re not building infrastructure from scratch, theyâ€™re not creating an enterprise that didnâ€™t exist, they are rebranding stores,â€ said Coulter.
Again, Target paid $1.85 billion dollars for that infrastructure and they are not continuing Zellers, they are doing away with them. One thing that is lost here is that Zellers is a poorly run discount retailer that offers horrible customer service, has rather high prices, and poor quality stock. I was in a couple during their clearance sales as they liquidated their stores and their prices were still higher than what Walmart. In their electronics department, they were still selling Nintendo Game Cubes that were released a decade ago and discontinued back in 2007 still at full prices. They had a 3.1 megapixel camera for sale that was over 13 years old on the shelves at over $200. Years ago I was in Zellers looking for a jacket. They had the one that I wanted but it was behind all of these pallets of stock. I asked if there was anyway I could get the $140 jacket so I could buy it. I was told â€œnoâ€ it would be a couple of days before they got this stock put out. First of all who puts stock out so you canâ€™t get to merchandise you want to sell. Secondly who says no to a customer who wants to spend money? Well, Zellers did. I cringed when I walked through there. Their shelves were a mess, stock was never put out in a timely fashion, and they never seemed to have anyone on the floor. Can you blame Target for not wanting to bring that culture to the new stores? If I was Target I would want staff who were trained the way I wanted them trained and did things the right way.
I feel bad for the employees but sometimes it happens that you work for a chain that isnâ€™t run well and gets bought out. If I was them, I would be more upset at Bonnie Brooks and the HBC board for selling rather than fixing your chain. Itâ€™s them that screwed you over, not Target.