In New York, a battle rages on what to do with brutalist architecture. Should it be saved?
As Modernist buildings reach middle age, many of the stark structures that once represented the architectural vanguard are showing signs of wear, setting off debates around the country between preservationists, who see them as historic landmarks, and the many people who just see them as eyesores.
The conflict has come in recent months to this quaint village 60 miles north of New York City â€” with its historic harness-racing track, picturesque Main Street and Greek Revival, Federal and Victorian houses â€” where the blocky concrete county government center designed by the celebrated Modernist architect Paul Rudolph has always been something of a misfit.
â€œI just donâ€™t think it fits with the character of the county seat and the village of Goshen,â€ said Leigh Benton, an Orange County legislator who grew up in the area. â€œI just thought it was a big ugly building.â€
Completed in 1967, the building has long been plagued by a leaky roof and faulty ventilation system and, more recently, by mold; it was closed last year after it was damaged by storms, including Tropical Storm Irene.
Edward A. Diana, the Orange County executive, wants to demolish it, an idea that has delighted many residents but alarmed preservationists, local and national, who say the building should be saved. The county legislature is expected to decide whether to demolish or renovate it next month.
Those who want to save it call it a prime example of an architectural style called Brutalism that rejected efforts to prettify buildings in favor of displaying the raw power of simple forms and undisguised building materials, like the centerâ€™s textured facade.
â€œPreservation is not simply about saving the most beautiful things,â€ said Mark Wigley, the dean of Columbiaâ€™s Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation. â€œItâ€™s about saving those objects that are an important part of our history and whose value is always going to be a subject of debate.â€
The article does have one great quote that describes both the Sturdy Stone Centre and the Education Building at the University of Saskatchewan.
In an interview Theodore Dalrymple, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute who has written about the architecture of Le Corbusier, described Brutalist buildings as â€œabsolutely hideous, like scouring pads on the retina.â€
That sounds about right.