Would you say the emerging church is too much “google”? That is, too much emphasis on getting things done, too much “pure work”? And too little interaction and too little fun?

Far too many emerging churches attempt to monetize church (usually unsuccessfully), like the way Google monetized search (suvccessfully).

For my masters, I designed an online church system (in 1987), that today would be a “tweeting” church. What would emerging church 2.0 (semantically, really 3.0) look like – twitter, facebook, foursquare? …