I posted about Andrew Jonesâ€™ decision on the weekend and I can respect what he is doing as he has been a person of his convictions and one has to do what one has to do.
He makes a pretty good case for leaving.
Also over is any official relationship I have left with one of those emerging church groups called Emergent Village. EV is a hard group to leave because its a flat structured organization and there is no one to inform that you are de-friending yourself, or getting de-friended, from this "generative friendship". Also hard because there are so many wonderful people still involved.
The EV website stated last year, "Those who started emergent were at the National ReEvaluation Forum in 1998; those who will take it into the next chapter will be at Christianity21." I wasnâ€™t at Christianity21 but I have been watching as new theological emphases and sectarian attitudes towards church emerge (well described by Wikipediaâ€™s North American Emergent Movement) and it is just not something that I can lend my name to or my time. In the early days, I joined the leadership of the Young Leaders group (that eventually became Emergent Village) because it was more about uniting churches around mission and equipping people to reach the next â€˜postmodernâ€™ generation. I hope they can shift it back again to its origins.
I remember cringing when I saw the Emergent Village stating "Those who started emergent were at the National ReEvaluation Forum in 1998; those who will take it into the next chapter will be at Christianity21." They were right in the fact that Emergent Inc was started back then but the emerging church was taking seed all over the world. As far as the statement about Christianity21â€¦ well Tony and Doug had a conference had a conference to promote and I take that statement as nothing more than that. Emergent Villageâ€™s desire to be a promotional commercial vehicle of a flavor of the emerging church in the United States was a flaw from the start but in the end I think it was a reflection of the entrepreneurial commercial context that seems to define the American church industry. While emergent talked of this being a global conversation, they never realized how incredibly American they are. In that way by Andrew saying that he wonâ€™t be using the language of Emergent Village and the emerging church may be a good one because while language is really important, the discussion of the emerging church has been more about language than it is has about incarnating the gospel for a long time.
You know what, I am okay with it. I think that is the reason many of us gathered in Three Hills in the 90s, later some of us started Resonate and why the conversation in the U.K. and Europe is so incredibly different. We all have our national contexts and it does shape our ideas of church and the Gospel. While I am friends with many south of the border and I deeply appreciate them, I am also okay with them doing their thing and Iâ€™ll pipe in from the sidelines from time to time.
I guess what I struggle with is the idea of removing oneself from a conversation because in the end, you have given up on the conversation as a whole. Maybe Andrew is correct but I think his ability and unique place as a global missionary is a voice that is needed in Emergent Village, even if the North American church doesnâ€™t realize it.
Of course that for me not talking to the emerging church very much anymore, I think it is comes from the amount of pure crap that has been sent to me to review. I just got a copy of Dwight Friesenâ€™s new book, Thy Kingdom Connected and it may the only book of 2009 that I want to review and think more about. A friend of mine used to say, â€œIâ€™ll preach better when Max Lucado preaches betterâ€. I find myself feeling the same thing. When the conversation (and books) becomes more compelling, Iâ€™ll start paying close attention again.
Update: January 10th â€“ I am totally okay with accepting the fact that Emergent has always seemed too American because I am too Canadian. If I can say that I find Emergent too American, itâ€™s also fair to criticize me back so fair is fair.
Right now I am actually more happy with Emergent than I have been in years. I think having Doug and Tony work (and I really hope they make money as well) as consultants and event organizers through JoPa is good while leaving Emergent to be an organic grassroots expression across the country. I do agree with Mike Morrellâ€™s comment that the next thing to figure out is the relationship between publishing and Emergent.