<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2009-01-08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jordoncooper.com/2009/01/08/links-for-2009-01-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jordoncooper.com/2009/01/08/links-for-2009-01-08/</link>
	<description>A weblog about urbanism, technology, &#38; culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike O</title>
		<link>http://www.jordoncooper.com/2009/01/08/links-for-2009-01-08/comment-page-1/#comment-6331</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordoncooper.com/2009/01/08/links-for-2009-01-08/#comment-6331</guid>
		<description>&gt; tar sands

Why not just burn the tar sands in a boiler and ship the electricity, not the crude?  Or, for the 25 percent that you can&#039;t recover as liquids, burn that part?  I&#039;m sure it&#039;s not that simple (notice the mountains of sulfur that would wind up in the atmosphere, and making acid rain in Toronto).  But I bet there&#039;s a point where burning on site makes economic sense.

Think of tar sands as a different kind of coal, not a different kind of oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; tar sands</p>
<p>Why not just burn the tar sands in a boiler and ship the electricity, not the crude?  Or, for the 25 percent that you can&#8217;t recover as liquids, burn that part?  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s not that simple (notice the mountains of sulfur that would wind up in the atmosphere, and making acid rain in Toronto).  But I bet there&#8217;s a point where burning on site makes economic sense.</p>
<p>Think of tar sands as a different kind of coal, not a different kind of oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

