|
Blog
The Economic Consequences of George W. Bush
Nobel Laureate Joseph E. Stiglitz sees a generation long recovery from the Bush administration's policies. Up to now, the conventional wisdom has been that Herbert Hoover, whose policies aggravated the Great Depression, is the odds-on claimant for the mantle “worst president” when it comes to stewardship of the American economy. Once Franklin Roosevelt assumed office and reversed Hoover’s policies, the country began to recover. The economic effects of Bush’s presidency are more insidious than those of Hoover, harder to reverse, and likely to be longer-lasting. There is no threat of America’s being displaced from its position as the world’s richest economy. But our grandchildren will still be living with, and struggling with, the economic consequences of Mr. Bush. Labels: economics, politics
|
welcome
jordoncooper.com is a weblog about faith,
culture, & technology edited by Jordon Cooper since 2001. You can
read about me and the site here.
If
you've got feedback or something interesting to tell me, you can find
me here.
Follow
the site via RSS
,
see what I'm up to on Twitter,
my upcoming events,
or view my Flickr
photostream.
You may
also be interested in my thoughts on what
I am reading, the emerging
church, or what contextless
things I am linking to.
currently
enjoying
» AKMA
» Adam Klein
» Alan Creech
» Andrew Jones
» Beyond Magazine
» Bill Millar
» BLDG
Blog
»
Calgary Grit
» Charlie Wear
»
Daniel Miller
» Dan Sheffield
» Dave King
» Darren Friesen
» Darryl Dash
» David Fitch
» Dooce
»
Gloria
Reimer
» Guy
Kawasaki
»
Jamie Arpin-Ricci
» Jason Evans
» Jason Kottke
» Joi Ito
» Jonny Baker
»
Karen Ward
» Kester Brewin
» Len Hjalmarson
» Linea Lanoie
» Mark Scandrette
» Mike DeVries
»
Nathan Colquhoun
»
One House
»
Pernell
Goodyear
»
Randall Friesen
» Rebecca Blood
» Rick Bennett
» Rudy Carrasco
» Scott Williams
» Stephen Shields
»
Steve Collins
» Steve Taylor
» Steven Johnson
»
The
Homeless Guy
» Today
at the Mission
»
Tony
Jones
»
Warren Kinsella
» Wendy Cooper
&
|
3 Comments:
But the Bush administration had its own ideas. The first major economic initiative pursued by the president was a massive tax cut for the rich, enacted in June of 2001.
Ahh...and after an entire page of BS we finally get to the real point: a guy who hates tax cuts gets to talk about the future of a country. I wonder what HIS future looks like?
Nothing like a big load of crap from Vanity Fair, posing as sound economic principles.
Of course, the question has to be asked whether the president is supposed to be the "steward" of the economy. Also, was FDR a great president because he shredded the Constitution in favor of the economy? (Neither of which exonerates Mr. Bush.)
ummm...arnt you Canadian?
Post a Comment
<< Home