Post Charismatic is now available in the U.K.
This is pretty cool, Rob McAlpine's book Post Charismatic is available in the U.K. and is coming to a North America near you soon.
Labels: theology
|
Blog
This is pretty cool, Rob McAlpine's book Post Charismatic is available in the U.K. and is coming to a North America near you soon. Labels: theology Today I joined Rod's family and co-workers at the Centre at Mayfair United Church for Rod's funeral. It was a tough service but we did a good job honoring his memory. He was a good friend and will be missed for a long time to come. Labels: friends, Salvation Army, work For those of you who haven't heard of Jeffery Manchester, you may want to check out his story on Wikipedia. Manchester hid inside a Toys-R-Us store for over 2 months before venturing out into an adjacent abandoned building where he created an apartment equip with A/C, electricity, and a complex surveillance system made out of stolen baby monitors. Manchester had been in isolation for over four months and despretaly needed companionship. In an attempt to re-start his life, Manchester performed one last robbery on the Toys-R-Us before escaping through his secret door connecting the two buildings. Manchester then watched his surveillance system as police and SWAT cleared and searched the area to no avail. With the money he needed, Manchester now integrated himself into a church community where he became involved with his soon to be girlfriend "Leigh" I don't know if he is the greatest criminal ever but part of me is impressed by his nerve. Labels: ideas A while ago I was chatting with a teacher who was talking how difficult it was to teach at the school they were at. Transience and a almost nomadic existence of the families had a constant turnover of kids and on top of that, many parents were totally disengaged from the education process. I see that at work and also at home with Mark's friends who have been moved out of his school to another one in the pursuit of cheaper rent, divorce, or eviction. It isn't the kid's fault but of course they pay the biggest price. At work I have been studying demographic trends for two projects I am working on. Part of it is looking closely at the neighborhoods we serve. I also need some comparison neighborhoods and I have been using Mayfair (where we live), Lawson Heights (where I grew up), Lakeview (where I used to work), Nutana (where I like to go for coffee), and City Park (again, it's the coffee). I know data interpretation is a science and art and I don't claim to have an understanding of either but when I look at Riversdale/Meadow Green/Pleasant Hill/King George (note to self, take some better photos of these places and upload them to Wikipedia) and compare them to those other neighborhoods, it shows how serious the need is in these neighborhoods. I was looking at some crime stats the other day and I thought that they were high for the year but they weren't even for the year, they were for the month. Before I dismissed them, I thought back to the day that Wendy was grabbed in our car while waiting for me outside of work and also the evening I was grabbed by a drunk while walking home from the theatre with Mark. In Wendy's case, she was okay and in my case, being 6'4" and sober was enough to deal with the situation but looking back at it, there is a lot of violence here. Of course on top of that there is the poverty, the disintegration of family values (I was talking to one agency where older sisters were pimping out younger ones), rampant drug use, illiteracy, and the gangs. Now I know this is an academic exercise since almost no one plants churches in poor neighborhoods (why would you where there is wealth in the new suburbs?) but do we ever ask ourselves what is the best way to make an impact on urban communities and could there be a better way to positively make a difference other than hold worship services other than a Sunday? Of course there is. When one looks at what is making a difference in most inner cities, they are not churches. In Saskatoon there is The Bridge, the Friendship Inn, the Saskatoon Food Bank, White Buffalo Youth Lodge, the Salvation Army Community Centre, Egadz, Quint Community Economic Development Corporation (a non-profit organization founded by residents of the five core neighbourhoods in 1995. When a community meeting concluded two years later that affordable housing was key to solving inner city problems, Quint stepped forward with solutions. By 2002 they had helped over 100 low-income families with children become homeowners. These families pay, on average, $33 less on their mortgage payments than they did on their previous rental payments) and other organizations who provide a wide variety of services for the community. While there are some wonderful churches and cathedrals downtown, they serve a different demographic and are not involved many social justice issues. My question is what if we started to start ministries and ideas that had the community in mind as opposed to planting another church, what would they look like? I think of Harambee (I love their history), Urban Rest Stop, a small scale family housing program, third spaces like the Freeway, or the Franktuary (read the story), or places like the Simple Way, Mustard Seed House, or the Hawthorn House. My other question is what if we made a commitment to the places abandoned by the empire? I expressed my frustration before about the 1000 Christians descending on the west side to "clean up the place" for a day. I guess it gives warm fuzzy's to people who don't actually shop, live, or even visit the lower west side but I am talking about making a long term commitment to a place that are often left behind. These places aren't just in the inner city either. I was outside of Ottawa a couple of years ago and some of the rural communities look like the last the good thing that happened to them was during the Diefenbaker years. I think of what former NHLer Joe Juneau is doing up in northern Quebec. When I have shared these discussions previously, one of the questions that comes up is sustainability. Of course all of the links I have given have shown sustainability over the years in a variety of ways but there is a bigger question that we don't often address and that is the unspoken idea something has to support a salary (often of clergy) to be worthwhile. Until we figure out a way to fight our addiction to a paycheck from the church, the mission of many churches will be to provide employment for pastors. Are we courageous enough to take a risk knowing that it probably won't pay off but because it is the right thing to do and do it in some of the poorest neighborhoods where they may be no pay off? Well, others have and made a big difference. Real change always starts at the fringes, someone said something or the other about faith and a mustard seed once... Labels: church, church planting, emerging church Yeah winning a lot of games is nice but one has to wonder if the combined cost of the O.J. Mayo and Reggie Bush scandals is worth it for USC? Labels: sports This came from Jason Evans today and it will be of interest for some of you. "But why this starts a new season for us is that these programs commence a new project that we are taking on with the Ecclesia Collective. We are now in the process of developing an internship program. This program would take 3 to 4 young people that would live in the loft, above our home, spending 10 to 12 months as a part of the Hawthorn House community. Interns would spend time with our community, share meals and rhythms with us, work in our garden with us and we would (preferably) connect with a neighborhood non-profit agency or locally owned business for part time work. Brooke and I will meet with the interns every week for guided time to discuss spiritual formation, social engagement and community life among other things. The internships will not start until this coming fall at the earliest. If you are interested, get in touch." Labels: church, community, education, emerging church A couple of weeks ago Jason Evans started to post about the recession and the church which started me thinking as I was reading Howard Kunstler's excellent book, The Long Emergency (Wikipedia summary - Full text available on at Google Books) for about the third time. If you haven't read it, you need to. The upshot of all this is that we are entering a historical period of potentially great instability, turbulence and hardship. Obviously, geopolitical maneuvering around the world's richest energy regions has already led to war and promises more international military conflict. Since the Middle East contains two-thirds of the world's remaining oil supplies, the U.S. has attempted desperately to stabilize the region by, in effect, opening a big police station in Iraq. The intent was not just to secure Iraq's oil but to modify and influence the behavior of neighboring states around the Persian Gulf, especially Iran and Saudi Arabia. The results have been far from entirely positive, and our future prospects in that part of the world are not something we can feel altogether confident about. And then there is the issue of China, which, in 2004, became the world's second-greatest consumer of oil, surpassing Japan. China's surging industrial growth has made it increasingly dependent on the imports we are counting on. If China wanted to, it could easily walk into some of these places -- the Middle East, former Soviet republics in central Asia -- and extend its hegemony by force. Is America prepared to contest for this oil in an Asian land war with the Chinese army? I doubt it. Nor can the U.S. military occupy regions of the Eastern Hemisphere indefinitely, or hope to secure either the terrain or the oil infrastructure of one distant, unfriendly country after another. A likely scenario is that the U.S. could exhaust and bankrupt itself trying to do this, and be forced to withdraw back into our own hemisphere, having lost access to most of the world's remaining oil in the process. We know that our national leaders are hardly uninformed about this predicament. President George W. Bush has been briefed on the dangers of the oil-peak situation as long ago as before the 2000 election and repeatedly since then. In March, the Department of Energy released a report that officially acknowledges for the first time that peak oil is for real and states plainly that "the world has never faced a problem like this. Without massive mitigation more than a decade before the fact, the problem will be pervasive and will not be temporary." Which will mean that we need to make some changes The circumstances of the Long Emergency will require us to downscale and re-scale virtually everything we do and how we do it, from the kind of communities we physically inhabit to the way we grow our food to the way we work and trade the products of our work. Our lives will become profoundly and intensely local. Daily life will be far less about mobility and much more about staying where you are. Anything organized on the large scale, whether it is government or a corporate business enterprise such as Wal-Mart, will wither as the cheap energy props that support bigness fall away. The turbulence of the Long Emergency will produce a lot of economic losers, and many of these will be members of an angry and aggrieved former middle class. Over the years I had a lot of discussions on what this will mean to the church. Chris Marshall is wondering the same thing My truck is paid off but the gas prices are killing me. I don't drive that much and its over $300 per month, not including my wife's car. So what does this project to as a national economy? Recession seems inevitable, will it go way beyond that? A nation already ruled by fear and over-spending with no margins by individuals and the government, what will be the consequences? How will this impact churches and mortgages and credit lines that can't be fed? As builders pass on who are the committed givers what is left? 1/2 of boomers are there to give and the other 1/2 are driven past their financial margins with consumerism and can't help. Gen X and Millenials have very little value in long term commitments, are all about instant gratification and consumerism is their native language. Commonly this group of up and comers are living on 125-140% of their income taking on exponential debt per year. What will be the result of these decisions having no margins when the shoe drops? Will American churches go the way of their European counterparts? Becoming really funky coffee houses, restaurants, art galleries and dance clubs. Just things I wonder about. I know a couple of people who are the boards of Bible colleges and seminaries who talk about getting new projects done in the next couple of years before the builders who give most of the money to churches and institutions pass away. After that they know that the money will be in far less supply. On top of that, while churches like to talk about sacrificial giving and committed tithers, most studies show that people give when the economy is good and are more casual tithers. When faced with higher heating costs, much higher fuel prices, and more money to go to food, will the cash go to paying the churches bills or their own bills? One thing that economists have been saying for a long time is that our lifestyle is being financed by VISA and when a recession hits, it will hurt those that are carrying debt the most. In 2004, Maclean's ran this story about Canadian's personal debt being at record levels. And so this summer Russell Kent and his wife, Mary, joined the legions of other young families in opting to ignore the admonitions they'd heard from their parents and taking the plunge into home ownership. They bought a house in the suburbs north of Toronto - and in the process have run up their debts far above anything they'd ever imagined. The house cost more than the top amount they'd intended to spend. They had to drain much of their savings and load up on personal lines of credit to muster a 25 per cent down payment. In total, they now owe roughly $340,000, spread across a mortgage, three lines of credit and two credit cards. Every month, $920 goes to pay interest on the cards and bank lines, and another $1,460 toward the mortgage. Mary also spends $300 a month to lease her car. Debt payments eat up close to a third of their after-tax income. Russell says making ends meet over the next few years will be "like stretching a gnat's ass over a rain barrel." If the Kents feel intimidated by the debt challenge ahead of them, they're not alone. Collectively, Canadian consumers now owe $752.1 billion, according to Bank of Canada, up 36 per cent in the past 10 years when adjusted for inflation. Over the same period, personal disposable income, or take-home pay, has risen 15 per cent. In other words, Canadians are piling on debt more than twice as fast as their income is growing. It is conceivable that many churches in a particular region of the country could find themselves in a horrible financial mess when funds drive up and the demand on church and other social services intensifies. While many recessions are relatively short lives to the last big one in the 1970s, there are many who are forecasting the next economic meltdown to last much longer. Of course this will hit the church in a couple of ways. I am a disciple of Thomas Homer-Dixon and I tend to think that there will be an upside of the coming age of scarcity. I think the church has a tremendous opportunity during this period of change. Of course a lot of things we think are sacred cows will be turned into black angus burgers but c'mon, it isn't as if we did that well during the age of abundance anyways. While managing to start a bunch of megachurches, we also managed to usher the church into a very long period of decline and irrelevance and that was after spending billions and billions on church growth. As we enter into a new age of global warming, scarcity, and perhaps conflict over resources, maybe the church adapt a little better this time. Also: Alan Creech has posted some more thoughts on his blog Labels: architecture, church, design, energy, Third Space David Fitch challenges Mark Driscoll's assertations that the emerging church does not have converts. Labels: emerging church, evangelism, theology 28. Play go fish with a kid. You don't crush kids. You talk their ear off, make an event out of it, tell them stories about when you were a kid this or in Vegas that. You have to play their game, too, even though they may have been playing only for weeks. Observe. Teach them without once offering a lesson. And don't be afraid to win. They can handle it. The full list is from Esquire Labels: ideas Labels: Arlington Beach, Mark Cooper, Saskatchewan |
welcome Follow
the site via RSS
You may also be interested in my thoughts on what I am reading, the emerging church, or what contextless things I am linking to. currently
enjoying
» Beyond Magazine »
Daniel Miller »
Gloria
Reimer »
Jamie Arpin-Ricci
» Len Hjalmarson
» Mark Scandrette »
Randall Friesen
» Scott Williams »
Today
at the Mission »
Warren Kinsella
currently
enjoying |
|
jordoncooper.com
|
Thanks for stopping by! |
|
web
|
blog
|
|
social
media
|
flickr
|
|
content
|
writing | resources | emerging church | quote library |
|
info
|
biography | contact | disclosure |
|
|